Well, that was disappointing though I can't say the result was unexpected. We had our chances, as did they, but they were better in taking advantage and that's the difference between having a bottomless money bag and having to be fiscally sound. Yes, we can buy great players, but not for asking price like City. They bought Jovetic for £22m on talent alone. Prior to today, the 24-year-old had 6 goals in 17 career matches for City, while £12m Daniel Sturridge has scored 36 in 50. They should have never let the latter go.
The positive points were... not sure. Honestly, I think we played well enough to lose 1-3. It makes me question if we have the talent to compete for the league. Players made mistakes and other than Glen Johnson, nobody was habitual in their error proneness, but we've been used to our right back's faults for a while now. Though I don't think Manquillo starting would have made a huge difference, he would have at least gave us a chance. Is Johnson playing amazing in training or something? I just don't understand why Rodgers started/played him today.
Moreno had a decent debut despite being blamed for the opening goal. It was more Jovetic's superb little push-on then our new left back's inability to clear the ball which lead to the goal. Not much could have been done there, Glen Johnson would have probably just went ahead and put it in the net for City. The 22-year-old Spaniard debutant led the side with 4 tackles, had two take-ons, and completed 90.5% of his passes (38 of 42).
Statistically speaking, nobody truly stood out. Mignolet lead the side with a 95% pass completion rate (19/20) including 6/7 long balls, but our Belgium keeper probably could have done a better job stopping shots. Sturridge filled up the stat sheet with two shots on target, two chances created, three take-ons, a tackle and a clearance, but also posted a team-worst 70% passing rate. If I had to pick a player of the match for us, it would be Gerrard. The ageless one had 2 key passes, 3 tackles, 2 clearances, an interception, an led all outfield starters with a 93% successful pass rate.
Though this match does matter in some degree, we must move on and realize that it doesn't make much difference in the title race. Not showing up against a lower table side would concern me much more. We didn't play all that bad, but we didn't take advantage of the opportunities afforded us, which is worrisome. Suarez would have made no difference by the way, as he rarely showed up in matches against top competition.
Showing posts with label Jovetic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jovetic. Show all posts
Monday, August 25, 2014
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Brendan Rodgers is not a bad manager, but he's young and still has to learn from his mistakes. Unfortunately, Liverpool may not be the ...
-
The first match I get to watch live in nearly two weeks and it does nothing for my confidence in this side. In fact it confirms any doubts ...
-
Players must have played at least 300 minutes to qualify. Efficiency ratings are how likely a positive outcome will occur while that player...
-
It has officially become a two horse race. Sure, Spurs, Chelsea, and even the Gunners could go on a run, but in the end, it will take a sig...
-
It is sad and pathetic that the English press and the wind-up blogs are attempting, though ever so poorly, to blame Steven Gerrard for the e...
-
It's getting old. We are not good enough to challenge for even a Champions league spot and that's becoming more apparent by the mat...
-
Even though we didn't play this past weekend, we had a ton of players who saw action for country or on-loan club. First off, as I menti...
-
The second half began no promising then the first. We were out of sync on attack and failed to gain control of the match, but as the clock...
-
When Sam Allardyce was the boss at Bolton, he actually held his own against Liverpool. In the 13 times his Wanderers met Liverpool, they we...