It is no surprise how the press and pundits are playing up yesterday's match. To admit that one side had intentions of playing football, while the other decided on trench warfare, putting ten men behind the ball, would have been honest yet unacceptable. To admit that one side was actually attempting to play 'the beautiful game', while the other had aspirations of turning it into a wrestling match, apparently isn't part of the company line. Then again, selling papers has never been about writing the truth. As Mae West once said, "Virtue has its own reward, but has no sale at the box office."
If the roles had been reversed yesterday and Liverpool had played like United, win or not, they would have been thrown into the gauntlet. They would have been chastised for their drab and uncreative approach, sacrificed for their cowardly ways, and written off as a side that is afraid to play proper football. Since it was the other way around though, Man U are commended for their excellent defending. As Mark Twain put it, "Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please."
It is neither surprising nor shocking that this perspective is being force-fed as the acceptable conclusion. The press and the pundits know how their bread is buttered. Ultimately, English football becomes the victim and it's a shame the culprits can't see the damage they're inflicting. It is no wonder that the game has to go abroad for new fans, as the local ones, tired of the sensationalism and deceit, are turning away in droves. To quote Benjamin Franklin, "Trickery and treachery are the practices of fools that have not the wits enought to be honest."
That was far from good nor entertaining football yesterday, but at least Liverpool tried to make it so. It's surprising that a side as expensive and talented as Man U would go for such a game plan or possibly the only true class side on the pitch yesterday was wearing red. Rafa obviously didn't receive the memo that 'shit on a stick' would be acceptable on the day or maybe since he now has the horses to win any race, he mistakenly thought football would be allowed to be played. Another mistake by the press that they've yet to use against our gaffer. I'm sure it's only a matter of time though.
Monday, December 17, 2007
Liverpool 0, Man U 1: The 'double standard' press strikes again
Labels:
LFC,
Liverpool,
liverpool fc,
Man U,
Manchester United
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Is there really much else to say? I guess we could have played back and come to think of it, probably should have after the early goal, but...
-
Keita Baldé Diao is a 19-year-old Spanish forward of Senegalese descent, who is currently plying his trade at Italian club, SS Lazio. He wa...
-
What a terrible bit of business. Buying Lallana for a reported £27m may end up being worse than United buying Herrera for £32m. He wasn...
-
As I mentioned in my last post, I've been tediously mulling over data during the international break, the extent of which might deem me ...
-
If rumors are true and we are about to sign Falcao on loan for ridiculous wages, well, I guess it's better than nothing. The 28-year-ol...
-
After dishing out ridiculous sums for turnover prone 25-year-old , Ander Herrera, and the nemesis of Victor Moses , Luke Shaw, they are now ...
-
Most efficient in possession Man City 0.695 Arsenal 0.690 Man U 0.681 Everton 0.676 Chelsea 0.673 Liverpool 0.645 Keeping the ball ...
-
Before the World Cup match between Uruguay and England, Roy Hodgson said that Luis Suarez is not yet 'world class'. Well, he found ...
-
There isn't really much going on in the world of Liverpool Football Club, just reiterations of yesterday's headlines, so I've de...
-
Whether this Goal article has even an ounce of truth to it, it is still amusing. In it, apparently Alexis Sanchez claims he chose Arsenal...
No comments:
Post a Comment