Furthermore, there's nothing in his statistical output that separates him from what we already have at the club. Here are his numbers from last season for Lille along with last season's production of fellow 19-year-old Sterling and the player Origi should long to emulate, Daniel Sturridge:
Origi | Sterling | Sturridge | |
age | 19 | 19 | 24 |
app (sub) | 12(18) | 24(9) | 26(3) |
mins | 1286 | 2220 | 2267 |
goals | 5 | 9 | 21 |
assists | 0 | 5 | 7 |
chances | 18 | 51 | 29 |
npg90 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.83 |
gcp90 | 0.35 | 0.57 | 1.1 |
ccp90 | 1.3 | 2.06 | 1.2 |
pass % | 79.1 | 81.7 | 79.3 |
bp % | 54.2 | 46.8 | 53.4 |
sacc % | 54.2 | 48.9 | 42.4 |
shot % | 20.8 | 20 | 21.2 |
TTI90 | 12.2 | 12.1 | 11 |
First and foremost, Origi primarily starts up front and covers the left side of the pitch. Overall his numbers are eerily similar to Sterling with two exceptions, chances created and back pass percentage. Sterling creates nearly a chance more per 90 and passes towards his own goal much less.
The only thing separating him and Sturridge is goal-scoring rate, which is kind of important when you're a forward. Their shooting rate is similar, though Origi has the superior shooting accuracy percentage, which tells me he tends to take bad shots and/or fails to challenge the keeper most of the time.
The bottom line is Origi is not what we need and he's not dynamic enough to justify bringing him in for what will probably be a speculative price. Let him prove himself elsewhere for 4-5 seasons and when Sturridge starts to go in decline then try to sign him. Right now he's just the victim of the World Cup hype train.
No comments:
Post a Comment