Ezequiel Lavezzi is like a fine wine, he's gotten better with age, but is he good enough to help Liverpool win? He doesn't score many goals, he has more than his fair share of turnovers, and he's an average passer at best, though he does make his passes count. Over the past five seasons, he has a 2.03 chances created per 90 and a chance created value of 10.67%, both above average numbers in any league.
Ironic enough, the thing he does best was the about the only thing he hasn't consistently improved upon each season. Last season he posted career percentage highs in pass completion (79.25%), shot accuracy (53.19%), and shot on target rate (19.15%). Unfortunately, he set a career low in assists with zero and a chance created value also of zero, despite a 1.73 chance created per 90. His turnover rate of 12.8 was a career low, but it's still not great and at 29, how many seasons does he have left in him? We don't need another Rickie Lambert.
What is really alarming is that he has never posted a positive goals on pitch difference for any club any season, meaning he has never been a consistent contributor (or game changer) for a positive overall result. In fact, his worst gopd season came last year, when he posted a -0.31 despite playing for the Ligue 1 champions.
There's really nothing Lavezzi does great, he's just an all-round good second striker. He's not a 'big' signing, despite the hype and I get the feeling Rodgers would have to drastically overpay for him, a luxury we can't afford now that we've added Lovren and Origi at exorbitant prices. He doesn't have the pace to compete in the Prem anymore, if he ever truly did, and there's really nothing in his past that indicates he's suddenly going to be a world beater. Personally, I think Liverpool should pass and try to get Reus, Shaquiri, or Kruse.
No comments:
Post a Comment