Well, that was disappointing though I can't say the result was unexpected. We had our chances, as did they, but they were better in taking advantage and that's the difference between having a bottomless money bag and having to be fiscally sound. Yes, we can buy great players, but not for asking price like City. They bought Jovetic for £22m on talent alone. Prior to today, the 24-year-old had 6 goals in 17 career matches for City, while £12m Daniel Sturridge has scored 36 in 50. They should have never let the latter go.
The positive points were... not sure. Honestly, I think we played well enough to lose 1-3. It makes me question if we have the talent to compete for the league. Players made mistakes and other than Glen Johnson, nobody was habitual in their error proneness, but we've been used to our right back's faults for a while now. Though I don't think Manquillo starting would have made a huge difference, he would have at least gave us a chance. Is Johnson playing amazing in training or something? I just don't understand why Rodgers started/played him today.
Moreno had a decent debut despite being blamed for the opening goal. It was more Jovetic's superb little push-on then our new left back's inability to clear the ball which lead to the goal. Not much could have been done there, Glen Johnson would have probably just went ahead and put it in the net for City. The 22-year-old Spaniard debutant led the side with 4 tackles, had two take-ons, and completed 90.5% of his passes (38 of 42).
Statistically speaking, nobody truly stood out. Mignolet lead the side with a 95% pass completion rate (19/20) including 6/7 long balls, but our Belgium keeper probably could have done a better job stopping shots. Sturridge filled up the stat sheet with two shots on target, two chances created, three take-ons, a tackle and a clearance, but also posted a team-worst 70% passing rate. If I had to pick a player of the match for us, it would be Gerrard. The ageless one had 2 key passes, 3 tackles, 2 clearances, an interception, an led all outfield starters with a 93% successful pass rate.
Though this match does matter in some degree, we must move on and realize that it doesn't make much difference in the title race. Not showing up against a lower table side would concern me much more. We didn't play all that bad, but we didn't take advantage of the opportunities afforded us, which is worrisome. Suarez would have made no difference by the way, as he rarely showed up in matches against top competition.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
QPR selling Loic Remy for only £10m is insane. He's worth twice that, easy. If Rodgers can get him for £15m, that's still a great p...
-
Formations have basically ceased to matter and as soon as football catches up to evolution, they may all together. Managers like Rafa, Mour...
-
It is baffling that the signing of Kevin Stewart is deemed 'news'. What is more pathetic though is when a blog sensationalizes and ...
-
To get sacked and go on holiday. I have little doubt that buying the Chelsea left back for his estimated valuation of £7m would be on par w...
-
When Sam Allardyce was the boss at Bolton, he actually held his own against Liverpool. In the 13 times his Wanderers met Liverpool, they we...
-
We are obviously shopping for a left back with reports that we have bid for Alberto Moreno and are also looking at Marcos Rojo & Daley B...
-
One thing that drives all football fans crazy is when your team gives away the ball. Peter Crouch, Luis Garcia, and Momo Sissoko used to br...
-
It is sad and pathetic that the English press and the wind-up blogs are attempting, though ever so poorly, to blame Steven Gerrard for the e...
-
I have all the respect in the world for Andrea Pirlo, he is one of the few Italians that I admire, and that says a lot because I have no lov...
-
Before the World Cup match between Uruguay and England, Roy Hodgson said that Luis Suarez is not yet 'world class'. Well, he found ...
No comments:
Post a Comment