Most that has been written and said concerning the recent run of events between Rafa Benitez and our American owners has been negative, but the effect on the side has been anything but. It has brought the club even closer together. Players, who in the past have voiced their displeasure with Rafa's rotation policies, are putting such notions behind them and concentrating on being the best footballers they can be. Look no further than Peter Crouch's recent performances and John Arne Riise's return to favorable form versus Bolton as evidence to this revelation. Exorcising the demons has appeared to allow those two to once again be part of a positive flowing side.
The quarrel has also allowed us fans to once again display our unparalleled passion for the club. Not only does it boost the confidence of our manager and players, but imagine what other footballers from around the world think when they see thousands of fans marching in support of their manager or hear the songs of Rafa's army ringing throughout Anfield? It justifies a world class player like Fernando Torres leaving the only club and country he has ever known to play for us and makes the recruiting process Rafa has to go through to lure more class footballers to our side much easier. It simply tells the world that if you want to play for a club that will cherish you for giving your all when donning the kit, look no further than Liverpool Football Club.
Another positive is the distraction it forces on our opponents. Though an opposing manager would never admit it, it's also almost impossible to ignore with the onslaught of press coverage the tussle received. Anything to get the opposition to not think about tactics and strategy going into matches has to be a good thing, especially when you consider that it has just the opposite effect on our side. It makes our boys want the next match to come quicker, so they can forget all the extracurricular bullocks lurking about.
Finally, though it may be rubbish as this point, it obligated Rafa and the boys to approach each match individually, as if it were their last, and prevent overlooking the task at hand. That was most notably crucial for the Porto match since really nothing less than a win was required. Hopefully we can continue this approach, taking each battle one at a time and overwhelming our opponents is only gonna help us win the war and fill the trophy case.
It's often said that everything happens for a reason and the episode between our manager and our owners appears to be no different. Though it may have caused a temporary breach in the relationship between the two parties, it appears at this point to be on the mend, so everyone can move on to more important matters like winning matches. Our club now appears recharged with an emotional drive, every match seems an epic in itself, and a newfound self-belief that we can beat anyone has manifested. Though the soul of Liverpool was far from dead, it now burns with a passion augmented by knowing that truer words than 'You'll Never Walk Alone' have scarcely ever been spoken.
Showing posts with label Rafa Benitez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rafa Benitez. Show all posts
Monday, December 3, 2007
Saturday, December 1, 2007
Liverpool vs Bolton: What will Rafa do?
Apparently Fabio Aurelio is injured and won't be available at least for another week. I understand not letting the opposition know since the Brazilian is such a deadly passer, but Rafa, come on, you have my personal email address. It's not as if I would tell the world... then again. Anyhow, Bolton may have a bit of confidence coming into Anfield tomorrow after they beat Man U on Saturday, but let them kid themselves, they're still Bolton.
The Wanderers still sit 15th on the table, only scoring 12 goals in 14 matches, and to make matters worse, they'll be without their iconic Liverpool man, Kevin Nolan, and sensational upstart, Danny Guthrie. The only players that really worry me are former Reds Anelka and Diouf, but I'm hoping Carra and Hyppiä brush off the dust from the old training notes on how to contain them. Other than that, we should be able to thrash them, as long as our boys aren't as cocky as I.
Tactics shouldn't play much of a part in Rafa's selection. I'm thinking he'll go with his most rested players on principle alone. I'm thinking Arbeloa on the right and Riise on the left to accompany the geriatric stalwarts in the middle and Reina in goal. It would be a brilliant time to let either Emiliano Insua or Stephen Darby get a confidence boosting start, but I won't suffocate myself in hope.
In midfield, I like Gerrard on the right with Lucas and Momo in the middle. Both the Brazilian and the Malian should be raring to go and I truly hope they have dominating and impressive outings. On the left, it's got to be Kewell, but probably not. Anytime I'm sure of someone getting the nod, I'm always wrong. Finally, up front I like Crouch and Torres. I really don't like Kuyt paired with Crouch due to lack of pace, but once again, Rafa does what Rafa wants. Babel could get the call though.
Who can take a Torres,
start him with a Crouch?
Who can take a Babel
and pair him with Kuyt...
The Tinkerman can
Rafa-man can
The Tinkerman can
The Tinkerman can cause he mixes players up
and makes our club world class
Yes, I'm in rare form today. Anyhow, here's my final guess:
Reina
Riise
Carra
Hyppiä
Arbeloa
Kewell
Momo
Lucas
Gerrard
Kuyt
Torres
Bench:
Itandje
Babel
Finnan
Crouch
Leto
I went with Kuyt over Crouch because this isn't Europe. A bench of kids would be brilliant, but that just isn't going to happen. Hopefully Rafa takes more risks than I did, but we'll have to wait and see. It's imperative that Kewell and Kuyt have solid outings tomorrow. Anyhow, until then, Godspeed.
Today's Banter: Crouch not for sale, Hicks not selling, Agger not fit... yet, & more
Greetings, hope everyone is doing well. I'm neither sick nor incarcerated so life can't be that bad. Anyhow, I guess Rafa and Crouch have kissed and made up since it appears that the England International won't be going anywhere come January. If he continues to play like he did against Porto, even I wouldn't mind having him around. There was speculation earlier this season of him being unhappy about playing time and basically acting bigger than his boots, but apparently egos and differences have been put to rest and for the most part everyone is content. Which brings me to my next point.
In this past month, there's been a visible change in our side. Though there's always plenty of room for improvement as a squad, there appears to be a metamorphosis in attitude. Peter Crouch not whining about playing time being just one of the signs. The thing is, between the Blackburn match and the Fulham tie, our boys began to approach matches with a new found outlook. Instead of going in thinking that they will win because we're the better side, they started believing they would win despite the circumstances. I firmly believe it was the record-setting performance against Beşiktaş that assured them that they are a class bunch capable of beating anyone. Funny how revenge that would make Montezuma blush does that. Then, despite coming up empty most the Fulham match, we didn't give up and continued to push and attack until we finally broke the camel's back. I just thought I'd share that observation.
Apparently Hicks isn't interested in selling his shares in the club. In fact, he's angry that such speculation has come about. I find it a bit humorous that any grown man would get angry over such a thing, not that the press didn't just make up that angle to lure readers. Whether he's interested in selling his shares or not, I don't know, but with how unstable financial markets are these days, anything is possible.
The metatarsal injury Daniel Agger sustained two-and-a-half months back, still isn't fully healed, or at least it doesn't feel right to the soon-to-be 23-year-old. He could return next week though versus Reading thanks to special protective boots. Killer boots, man!
Going into tomorrow's match with Bolton, Rafa gave former Liverpool coach Sammy Lee some credit for Bolton's current run of form. As I mentioned in my kids watch yesterday, the Wanderers are unbeaten in their last five matches including a win over Man United. I'm not sure how much recognition their former manager deserves though, not playing Kevin Nolan wasn't exactly the brightest of ideas. He did break in Danny Guthrie into the starting side though, so I guess he's entitled to some credit for that. By the way, Bolton will not have either Nolan, due to suspension, or Guthrie, due to on-loan regulations, when we face them tomorrow.
Finally, Rafa has come out and said that Torres needs to improve his current form. I know that may shock some supporters who believe the striker was our best player in the Porto match, but let me assure you, if he was our best player, we would have lost. Two flashes of brilliance don't make a great match and I've seen Fernando play far better than that. If he was top that match, he would have probably scored four. Be back soon with my 'What will Rafa do?' for Bolton. Godspeed. Yes, that's my new favorite word.
In this past month, there's been a visible change in our side. Though there's always plenty of room for improvement as a squad, there appears to be a metamorphosis in attitude. Peter Crouch not whining about playing time being just one of the signs. The thing is, between the Blackburn match and the Fulham tie, our boys began to approach matches with a new found outlook. Instead of going in thinking that they will win because we're the better side, they started believing they would win despite the circumstances. I firmly believe it was the record-setting performance against Beşiktaş that assured them that they are a class bunch capable of beating anyone. Funny how revenge that would make Montezuma blush does that. Then, despite coming up empty most the Fulham match, we didn't give up and continued to push and attack until we finally broke the camel's back. I just thought I'd share that observation.
Apparently Hicks isn't interested in selling his shares in the club. In fact, he's angry that such speculation has come about. I find it a bit humorous that any grown man would get angry over such a thing, not that the press didn't just make up that angle to lure readers. Whether he's interested in selling his shares or not, I don't know, but with how unstable financial markets are these days, anything is possible.
The metatarsal injury Daniel Agger sustained two-and-a-half months back, still isn't fully healed, or at least it doesn't feel right to the soon-to-be 23-year-old. He could return next week though versus Reading thanks to special protective boots. Killer boots, man!
Going into tomorrow's match with Bolton, Rafa gave former Liverpool coach Sammy Lee some credit for Bolton's current run of form. As I mentioned in my kids watch yesterday, the Wanderers are unbeaten in their last five matches including a win over Man United. I'm not sure how much recognition their former manager deserves though, not playing Kevin Nolan wasn't exactly the brightest of ideas. He did break in Danny Guthrie into the starting side though, so I guess he's entitled to some credit for that. By the way, Bolton will not have either Nolan, due to suspension, or Guthrie, due to on-loan regulations, when we face them tomorrow.
Finally, Rafa has come out and said that Torres needs to improve his current form. I know that may shock some supporters who believe the striker was our best player in the Porto match, but let me assure you, if he was our best player, we would have lost. Two flashes of brilliance don't make a great match and I've seen Fernando play far better than that. If he was top that match, he would have probably scored four. Be back soon with my 'What will Rafa do?' for Bolton. Godspeed. Yes, that's my new favorite word.
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Liverpool vs Porto: What will Rafa do?
Here we go again with one of those matches where everything is on the line. The bad news is we still won't have Agger and Alonso, the good news is Yossi could return, Masche should return, and Finnan will be available despite suffering a knock against Newcastle. Some of the players who Rafa starts tomorrow will be of no surprise. I can't see Benitez not going with Crouch, Gerrard, Mascherano, Carra, Hyypiä, Aurelio, Arbeloa, and of course, Reina. That really only leaves two midfield spots and whom will be paired with Crouch.
On the left there are three options: Harry Kewell, Ryan Babel, and Yossi Benayoun. I think Kewell would be the best to go with here, mainly because he's probably more fit than Yossi and Babel's pace and skill is much more deadly as a late-game sub, especially if a spark is required. That leaves us with the other midfield spot. I'm thinking Gerrard will start on the right, so the question obviously is, who will pair with Mascherano? I think I'd take Lucas over Sissoko only because the Brazilian brings so much more energy and enthusiasm to the pitch as of late.
The other option Rafa has is starting Benayoun on the right with Gerrard paired in the middle with Masche, but I think if he goes with Aurelio and Crouch, and they do their normal Fabio cross to Crouch to head on to a streaking Gerrard or Babel or whomever, the middle of the pitch usually becomes cluttered. It's best to start Gerrard on the right to open up the defense, which brings me to the other forward. The problem with starting Torres is that he's a player who rarely ventures from the penalty box corridor, so even with Kewell/Babel on the left, there would still be a large portion of uncovered pitch on that side. That leaves either Kuyt or Voronin, and since Kuyt played Saturday and Voronin seems to be better on the left as it is, I'm gonna have to go with the Ukrainian.
If we fail to establish a lead by the 60th minute, the obvious move would for Babel to come in for Kewell and Torres for Crouch. This provides us with blistering pace against a hopefully fatigued Porto side. I think it's imperative we keep the ball on the ground as much as possible and slowly breakdown the Porto defense, a swift counter on a long ball mishap is all the recipe for an easy opposition score.
Here's my final guess:
Reina
Aurelio
Carragher
Hyppiä
Arbeloa
Riise
Mascherano
Lucas
Gerrard
Voronin
Crouch
Bench:
Itandje
Leto
Babel
Torres
Finnan
Benayoun
Kewell
I totally forgot about Riise, probably because he's been playing so poorly lately. All the more reason to see him start here. I know that doesn't leave much defensive cover on the bench, but if something were to occur, Arbeloa would just move over to the spot of need and Finnan would be brought on. I have a good feeling about this match, which isn't always a good thing. I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Cheers.
Rafa outwits media in pre-Porto match press conference
Despite numerous attempts to get Rafa to 'slip-up' during the pre-Porto match press conference and talk about the ongoing rift he's having with the owners, our manager wouldn't budge. You could tell from the beginning by his playful smirk of a countenance, Benitez was fully prepared to dodge any questions in that regard. The more I think about it though, and after watching it for a second time, the body language of both Rafa and Pepe Reina can almost be described as giddy. It was as if they were ecstatic that instead of concentrating on tomorrow's match, the press was concerned with off-the-pitch diversions. Maybe they are hoping this distracts Porto into thinking our boys won't be focused. It reminds me a bit of the first Barça match from last year. Don't be surprised if a win tomorrow pushes the Rafa/owners conflict down the memory hole.Overall the press conference was quite entertaining as everyone appeared to be in amicable spirits. You can read the transcript on the official site here (or if you have an e-season ticket, you can watch it there as well). You can also watch a part of it here as well.
One of the many highlights is this exchange:
Journalist: You've won a lot of trophies in your career by being single-minded and doing what you think is best for the club you've represented. Are you ever willing to compromise on that?Cheers.
Rafa: The best will be to win tomorrow, so I will try to compromise and win tomorrow.
Today's Banter: The mass exodus that would follow Rafa, The press & pundits toe the company line, Gerrard speaks up, & more
With the impending (and ridiculous) debacle concerning the future of Rafael Benitez set to play out in the near future, a potential aftershock to ponder is that his departure could gut our side, if not first psychologically, eventually physically. The possibility of those who followed Rafa from abroad requesting a transfer or, in the case of Javier Mascherano, refusing to sign a permanent, is highly likely. Contractually obligated or not, a band of discontent players is a near impossible task to motivate and in our case, a large portion of the squad would at least secretly harbor feelings of betrayal for the men signing their paychecks.
The lack of professionalism displayed in the situation so far would surely dampen any calls of such a notion from our players. Relieving Benitez of his managerial duties is akin to a spit in the face of our Spanish, South American, and other foreign players who played under Rafa at his previous clubs. If our owners want a plague of strife followed by a substantial player-forced reshuffle that has the plausible backlash of crippling the side, then by all means they should rid themselves of Rafa and his small-spending ways. The threat of Jose Mourinho and his thriftiness is laughable at best.
This is ultimately about money, nothing more and nothing less, not egos nor power-trips. Rafa has done an absolute brilliant job at building a squad using peanuts to lure elephants. If Gillett and Hicks think that ridding themselves of the Spaniard is even an option financially, they're far worse businessmen than can be fathomed. Securing a transfer fee for Kaladze of £4m and signing Mascherano to a permanent for £17m, fee and salary, were both tremendously savvy deals. The former appears to be no longer an option while the latter is in serious jeopardy.
The monetary repercussions of dealing with a squad full of scorned players is unimaginable. The losses due to Bosmans and circumstantial devaluations could easily reach a nine-figure sum. All investment of even the past year would most likely go to waste. The oath of fealty when it comes to players always lies with their manager. He's the one that shares their love of football and there will be always be someone to sign their checks. If Gillett and Hicks truly are shrewd businessmen then a simple weighing of pros and cons can only lead them to one conclusion, give Rafa the meager amounts he needs to make your club even more profitable when you sell or suffer the consequences of even more dire financial constraints.
Perusing the press today, I found two articles of particular interest. The first is a piece at Sky Sports which is disconcerting in tone, but suspicious in agenda. According to Spain-based journalist Graham Hunter, Rafa Benitez 'has changed.' Mr. Hunter says he has heard such notions regarding the alleged personality metamorphosis from 'many people' and it is 'why so many of his friends and supporters have left the club.' Friends and supporters left the club? Like who? The only person who has left the club due to a rift with Rafa that I'm aware of is Pako Ayestaran and from what I understand that was due to a philosophical change in training methods by Benitez that Ayesteran did not support. This article has anti-Rafa PR campaign written all over it and is illogical in premise. Rafa wants what is best for the club because in the end, it's what's best for him, an attempt to imply anything different is just absurd.
Then we have an even more odd article by former Liverpool great Ian Rush. He starts out chastising Rafa Benitez for not doing things the 'Liverpool way' and keeping the rift behind closed doors, but Benitez wasn't the instigator nor the violator of the unwritten rule, Hicks and Gillett spoke first with their official statement on the official Liverpool site. Had the owners not made such a strange announcement, Rafa wouldn't have been hounded and pressured by the press to reveal the true origins of the declaration. Then Rush's article gets even more uncanny as he goes on to praise Benitez for his accomplishments in his short time with our club and makes a plea for keeping him on board. So first he slaps Rafa on the hand for something he didn't do, but then follows it up with elicit praise for our manager. Interesting.
Steven Gerrard has basically stated that he will not be getting involved in the spat between our manager and owners. I can definitely see his view, I mean, as a club we are entering a crucial string of fixtures that we need to win, especially in Champions League, and all distractions should be set aside to concentrate on the task at hand. I do hope he realizes though that if push comes to shove, he has the power to play a major role in doing what is best for the club.
Finally, two Liverpool legends, Ian Callaghan and Gerry Byrne, are set to receive winner's medals for being part of the England side that won the 1966 World Cup. Since neither player were part of the XI that played in the final, they were excluded from receiving a medal. Now thanks to England 2018 World Cup bid ambassador Richard Caborn and FIFA President Sepp Blatter, all members appointed to the squad will do so. Cheers.
The lack of professionalism displayed in the situation so far would surely dampen any calls of such a notion from our players. Relieving Benitez of his managerial duties is akin to a spit in the face of our Spanish, South American, and other foreign players who played under Rafa at his previous clubs. If our owners want a plague of strife followed by a substantial player-forced reshuffle that has the plausible backlash of crippling the side, then by all means they should rid themselves of Rafa and his small-spending ways. The threat of Jose Mourinho and his thriftiness is laughable at best.
This is ultimately about money, nothing more and nothing less, not egos nor power-trips. Rafa has done an absolute brilliant job at building a squad using peanuts to lure elephants. If Gillett and Hicks think that ridding themselves of the Spaniard is even an option financially, they're far worse businessmen than can be fathomed. Securing a transfer fee for Kaladze of £4m and signing Mascherano to a permanent for £17m, fee and salary, were both tremendously savvy deals. The former appears to be no longer an option while the latter is in serious jeopardy.
The monetary repercussions of dealing with a squad full of scorned players is unimaginable. The losses due to Bosmans and circumstantial devaluations could easily reach a nine-figure sum. All investment of even the past year would most likely go to waste. The oath of fealty when it comes to players always lies with their manager. He's the one that shares their love of football and there will be always be someone to sign their checks. If Gillett and Hicks truly are shrewd businessmen then a simple weighing of pros and cons can only lead them to one conclusion, give Rafa the meager amounts he needs to make your club even more profitable when you sell or suffer the consequences of even more dire financial constraints.
Perusing the press today, I found two articles of particular interest. The first is a piece at Sky Sports which is disconcerting in tone, but suspicious in agenda. According to Spain-based journalist Graham Hunter, Rafa Benitez 'has changed.' Mr. Hunter says he has heard such notions regarding the alleged personality metamorphosis from 'many people' and it is 'why so many of his friends and supporters have left the club.' Friends and supporters left the club? Like who? The only person who has left the club due to a rift with Rafa that I'm aware of is Pako Ayestaran and from what I understand that was due to a philosophical change in training methods by Benitez that Ayesteran did not support. This article has anti-Rafa PR campaign written all over it and is illogical in premise. Rafa wants what is best for the club because in the end, it's what's best for him, an attempt to imply anything different is just absurd.
Then we have an even more odd article by former Liverpool great Ian Rush. He starts out chastising Rafa Benitez for not doing things the 'Liverpool way' and keeping the rift behind closed doors, but Benitez wasn't the instigator nor the violator of the unwritten rule, Hicks and Gillett spoke first with their official statement on the official Liverpool site. Had the owners not made such a strange announcement, Rafa wouldn't have been hounded and pressured by the press to reveal the true origins of the declaration. Then Rush's article gets even more uncanny as he goes on to praise Benitez for his accomplishments in his short time with our club and makes a plea for keeping him on board. So first he slaps Rafa on the hand for something he didn't do, but then follows it up with elicit praise for our manager. Interesting.
Steven Gerrard has basically stated that he will not be getting involved in the spat between our manager and owners. I can definitely see his view, I mean, as a club we are entering a crucial string of fixtures that we need to win, especially in Champions League, and all distractions should be set aside to concentrate on the task at hand. I do hope he realizes though that if push comes to shove, he has the power to play a major role in doing what is best for the club.
Finally, two Liverpool legends, Ian Callaghan and Gerry Byrne, are set to receive winner's medals for being part of the England side that won the 1966 World Cup. Since neither player were part of the XI that played in the final, they were excluded from receiving a medal. Now thanks to England 2018 World Cup bid ambassador Richard Caborn and FIFA President Sepp Blatter, all members appointed to the squad will do so. Cheers.
Monday, November 26, 2007
A petition to back Rafa Benitez as manager
Please sign this petition if you support Rafa Benitez, want his services as manager retained and his transfer policies implemented. It's imperative that Gillett and Hicks understand that this isn't their club, it's ours as well.
petition link:
http://www.petitiononline.com/amg83ds/petition.html
Cheers,
Brian
petition link:
http://www.petitiononline.com/amg83ds/petition.html
Cheers,
Brian
£4m?! You're having a laugh! Is it time for Gerrard to get involved?
According to this article in the Liverpool Daily Post, the current rift between Rafa and our owners is over £4m. That's the price quoted by AC Milan for their centre back, Kahka Kaladze, a player who would have instantly provided coverage at not only at that position, but at left back as well. In hindsight, I'm not sure if it would've mattered if you consider that the more Hyppiä has played, the better he's become, but I'm also not sure how long the aging Finn can keep it up.
Ultimately though, £4m is nothing, especially of a player with Kaladze's experience and quality. If the owners are going to quarrel over what essentially is peanuts, then Rafa has every right to go elsewhere. Think about that: £4m to basically put the problem of lack of centre back depth to rest. That's utterly ridiculous and inexcusable. If that's not a clear indication that Hicks and Gillett have no clue about football and/or bit off more than they could chew when they bought the club, I don't know what is.
I initially said I wouldn't be addressing this issue, but if there's any truth to this report, it's difficult to ignore. If Rafa's job is in jeopardy because our owners are misinformed in thinking we have the horses to win any race, than maybe it's time the most influential person at the club get involved. I know it's not his place, but Gerrard should at least offer some sort of mediation. I mean, according to most newspapers and blogs, he's an expert on how to solve England's lack of international competitiveness issue, so this should be a walk in the park for him. The squad as a whole should step up and show solidarity in backing Rafa, even if they disagree with his tactics and policies. He wants what's best for the side and has the silverware to prove he knows what he's doing.
The owners need to understand that they got the steal of the century when they bought our club and with just a bit more tweaking (by investing more money, of course), they could build something special. They basically bought a squad that has tons of potential, but just not there yet. Not handing over a mere £4m to augment the side even more, worries me to no end. I'm hoping a voice of reason comes out of somewhere to set everyone straight and I'm sure Gerrard could play that role, but if the meeting on December 16th doesn't go well, we can forget about even having a hope for silverware.
One tactic that the owners have implemented that has all the scent of a bureaucratic power play is stating that Rick Parry will be in charge of transfers. Naming a mediator whom is clearly on their side is a brilliant managerial move, but will only place the club deeper into disharmony and push Rafa further out the door. Ultimately Parry doesn't control the funds nor does he know what's best for our squad, Rafa does. This is where Gerrard needs to come forward and take the side of his manager. Stevie-G is the face and clear-cut breadwinner of the club, without his heroics, the mystique is lost. He is a local boy who against all odds has become a Champion of Europe, leading our club to amazing heights. If he gets involved and the owners still don't see it Rafa's way, well, then I guess we really will know where their true intentions lie and it's not for the better of the club.
Ultimately though, £4m is nothing, especially of a player with Kaladze's experience and quality. If the owners are going to quarrel over what essentially is peanuts, then Rafa has every right to go elsewhere. Think about that: £4m to basically put the problem of lack of centre back depth to rest. That's utterly ridiculous and inexcusable. If that's not a clear indication that Hicks and Gillett have no clue about football and/or bit off more than they could chew when they bought the club, I don't know what is.
I initially said I wouldn't be addressing this issue, but if there's any truth to this report, it's difficult to ignore. If Rafa's job is in jeopardy because our owners are misinformed in thinking we have the horses to win any race, than maybe it's time the most influential person at the club get involved. I know it's not his place, but Gerrard should at least offer some sort of mediation. I mean, according to most newspapers and blogs, he's an expert on how to solve England's lack of international competitiveness issue, so this should be a walk in the park for him. The squad as a whole should step up and show solidarity in backing Rafa, even if they disagree with his tactics and policies. He wants what's best for the side and has the silverware to prove he knows what he's doing.
The owners need to understand that they got the steal of the century when they bought our club and with just a bit more tweaking (by investing more money, of course), they could build something special. They basically bought a squad that has tons of potential, but just not there yet. Not handing over a mere £4m to augment the side even more, worries me to no end. I'm hoping a voice of reason comes out of somewhere to set everyone straight and I'm sure Gerrard could play that role, but if the meeting on December 16th doesn't go well, we can forget about even having a hope for silverware.
One tactic that the owners have implemented that has all the scent of a bureaucratic power play is stating that Rick Parry will be in charge of transfers. Naming a mediator whom is clearly on their side is a brilliant managerial move, but will only place the club deeper into disharmony and push Rafa further out the door. Ultimately Parry doesn't control the funds nor does he know what's best for our squad, Rafa does. This is where Gerrard needs to come forward and take the side of his manager. Stevie-G is the face and clear-cut breadwinner of the club, without his heroics, the mystique is lost. He is a local boy who against all odds has become a Champion of Europe, leading our club to amazing heights. If he gets involved and the owners still don't see it Rafa's way, well, then I guess we really will know where their true intentions lie and it's not for the better of the club.
Friday, November 23, 2007
Today's Banter: Hicks/Gillett show their true colors & more
What the hell is going on? I'm not really angry about the issue and I can't honestly say I'm surprised, but the recent action of our owners is just witless. Why would they come out with this statement? It makes no sense. Rafa hasn't voiced any complaints to the press concerning transfers, the closest he did was talk about wanting to sign Mascherano permanently and that wasn't even recently.
If that wasn't enough, Tom Hicks made more statements to the Liverpool Echo, which in my opinion is starting to make this sound like an anti-Rafa PR campaign. Here's what he had to say: "After the Champions League final in Athens, Rafa made certain demands of us and we responded to those demands in the summer... We brought in some good players and spent more money than has ever been spent before at this club. We now have some crucial games coming up in The Premier League and the Champions League and we want to see if we can win these games with the players we have. This was the message we gave to Rafa recently and I think during the international break he must have grown a bit frustrated about this. We told him to concentrate on the games coming up and nothing else and I guess he didn’t like that. George and I will be over in mid-December and that is the time to talk about other issues. It is really time for Rafa to quit talking about new players and to coach the players we have."
Let's take a closer look at these words, since Hicks appears to make some distorted allusions. First off, Liverpool "spent more money than has ever been spent before at this club." We only spent a net of £21-25m after you consider the amounts received from transfers. That's nothing compared to what Man U spent and nowhere near the boatloads Abramovich had to payout to make Chelsea competitive. Then he says, "This was the message we gave to Rafa recently and I think during the international break he must have grown a bit frustrated about this." Really? If he was frustrated, why are we hearing it from you? Rafa made no statements in this regard. To say such things is irresponsible and unprofessional. The owners clearly know nothing about football and furthermore, I actually think they believe we supporters aren't smart enough to assess our own club. If they aren't in it for the money, as they claimed when first purchasing the club, then they are the ones that need to shut up and start handing over the transfer money.
It's not like we'll need much anyhow. If we sell Carson and Crouch, that's at least £20m to spend right there. That covers Mascherano's fee and puts a little toward a centre back, hopefully Ezequiel Garay. We could also use another forward, but it's not a dire need with Babel capable of playing up front. If Hicks and Gillett think they can get away with just spending £25m and then blame Rafa for not bringing success to our club, they're sorely mistaken. Give him the players he needs or sell the f**king club! It's not as if he's spending insane amounts. Give him Man U money and we'll win the league, I guarantee it, but until then, they are the ones that need to shut up. Okay, so I did get worked up a little over that after all, but I'm not going to take any bullshit from our owners.
It's looking more and more likely that Hicks and Gillett had no idea what they were getting into when they bought the club. This isn't the Texas Rangers, Montreal Canadiens, Dallas Stars, or NASCAR. Even though Rafa has done phenomenal with the minimal funds provided and is slowly building our youth and development programs, the financial practices of their American sports franchises just won't cut it in the Premiership. There's no chance of parity curbed by a salary cap or luxury tax and it's going to be at least five years until we'll see the fruits of Rafa's youth movement ripen, but there's no guarantee of that either. If we don't see an investment of at least £60m in the next two transfer windows, I wouldn't blame Rafa for walking, and if that happens, there'll be hell to pay.
Speaking of which, in the now famous press conference from earlier today where Rafa said, "I am focusing on coaching and training my team." Thirteen times (!!!) in all, as response to questions other than about the Newcastle match, he also said he would consider the England job if he received an offer. It gave me a bit of much needed comic relief, but in reality, he'll never be offered the position and if so, would never accept. Rafa running England would be a disaster and both parties probably know it. It's not as if he wouldn't be successful, because I'm pretty certain he would, but most of the matches they would win would be utterly tedious 1-0 and ultimately that would be bad for England and the sport itself. I'm sure Rafa was just sending a message to the owners that he could go elsewhere, but they should already know that. Valencia and most La Liga clubs for that matter would love to have Benitez as their boss.
In transfer news, Ryan Flynn has joined Hereford United on one-month loan. He joins fellow LFC teammate Robbie Threlfall at the Edgar Street. Flynn was part of both the 2006 and 2007 FA Youth Cup winning sides. He'll be with the Bulls until the 22nd of December. Cheers.
If that wasn't enough, Tom Hicks made more statements to the Liverpool Echo, which in my opinion is starting to make this sound like an anti-Rafa PR campaign. Here's what he had to say: "After the Champions League final in Athens, Rafa made certain demands of us and we responded to those demands in the summer... We brought in some good players and spent more money than has ever been spent before at this club. We now have some crucial games coming up in The Premier League and the Champions League and we want to see if we can win these games with the players we have. This was the message we gave to Rafa recently and I think during the international break he must have grown a bit frustrated about this. We told him to concentrate on the games coming up and nothing else and I guess he didn’t like that. George and I will be over in mid-December and that is the time to talk about other issues. It is really time for Rafa to quit talking about new players and to coach the players we have."
Let's take a closer look at these words, since Hicks appears to make some distorted allusions. First off, Liverpool "spent more money than has ever been spent before at this club." We only spent a net of £21-25m after you consider the amounts received from transfers. That's nothing compared to what Man U spent and nowhere near the boatloads Abramovich had to payout to make Chelsea competitive. Then he says, "This was the message we gave to Rafa recently and I think during the international break he must have grown a bit frustrated about this." Really? If he was frustrated, why are we hearing it from you? Rafa made no statements in this regard. To say such things is irresponsible and unprofessional. The owners clearly know nothing about football and furthermore, I actually think they believe we supporters aren't smart enough to assess our own club. If they aren't in it for the money, as they claimed when first purchasing the club, then they are the ones that need to shut up and start handing over the transfer money.
It's not like we'll need much anyhow. If we sell Carson and Crouch, that's at least £20m to spend right there. That covers Mascherano's fee and puts a little toward a centre back, hopefully Ezequiel Garay. We could also use another forward, but it's not a dire need with Babel capable of playing up front. If Hicks and Gillett think they can get away with just spending £25m and then blame Rafa for not bringing success to our club, they're sorely mistaken. Give him the players he needs or sell the f**king club! It's not as if he's spending insane amounts. Give him Man U money and we'll win the league, I guarantee it, but until then, they are the ones that need to shut up. Okay, so I did get worked up a little over that after all, but I'm not going to take any bullshit from our owners.
It's looking more and more likely that Hicks and Gillett had no idea what they were getting into when they bought the club. This isn't the Texas Rangers, Montreal Canadiens, Dallas Stars, or NASCAR. Even though Rafa has done phenomenal with the minimal funds provided and is slowly building our youth and development programs, the financial practices of their American sports franchises just won't cut it in the Premiership. There's no chance of parity curbed by a salary cap or luxury tax and it's going to be at least five years until we'll see the fruits of Rafa's youth movement ripen, but there's no guarantee of that either. If we don't see an investment of at least £60m in the next two transfer windows, I wouldn't blame Rafa for walking, and if that happens, there'll be hell to pay.
Speaking of which, in the now famous press conference from earlier today where Rafa said, "I am focusing on coaching and training my team." Thirteen times (!!!) in all, as response to questions other than about the Newcastle match, he also said he would consider the England job if he received an offer. It gave me a bit of much needed comic relief, but in reality, he'll never be offered the position and if so, would never accept. Rafa running England would be a disaster and both parties probably know it. It's not as if he wouldn't be successful, because I'm pretty certain he would, but most of the matches they would win would be utterly tedious 1-0 and ultimately that would be bad for England and the sport itself. I'm sure Rafa was just sending a message to the owners that he could go elsewhere, but they should already know that. Valencia and most La Liga clubs for that matter would love to have Benitez as their boss.
In transfer news, Ryan Flynn has joined Hereford United on one-month loan. He joins fellow LFC teammate Robbie Threlfall at the Edgar Street. Flynn was part of both the 2006 and 2007 FA Youth Cup winning sides. He'll be with the Bulls until the 22nd of December. Cheers.
Thursday, November 22, 2007
The worst Liverpool site possibly ever
Well, we've found our winner for Liverpool 'wind-up blog' of the year... and possibly ever. It's clearly a case of someone trying to garner fame by slagging off on popular conceptions and theories because his mother waned him from the nipple prematurely. His lack of empirical evidence and legitimate data to back his raucous claims are clear indications of his inability to write an article as he put it 'rejecting biased media hype and and fawning 'blind-faith' fandom.' What a wanker and that's just one of the reasons I refuse to link him.
If you want someone who ignores other's opinions and in fact, mocks the status quo, look no further than here. I consistently mock mass media released articles for their ignorant zealotry and purposely shut out the rest of the world when watching Liverpool matches, just so my opinion isn't persuaded by outside influence. I doubt this plonker even watches matches and his 'data' is primitive at best if not made-up. The difference between me and him is that I do the actual work and am able to write a critical article without spouting half-truths riddled with overbearing arrogance to justify my opinion. This lad clearly has a severe case of cognizant dissonance to go with his Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Let's take a gander at the front page of his site so I can prove my point. His first article is 'Croatia debacle proves one thing: Steven Gerrard is NOT world class.' If that's not a good laugh, I don't know what is. His opening sentence? 'Steven Gerrard’s abject ability as a Captain was exposed once again as England suffered ignominious defeat to Croatia.' Well, if that doesn't prove that this guy spends more time during a match looking in a mirror than he does actually watching a match, I don't know what does. He clearly isn't a Liverpool fan. Gerrard worked his ass off in the Croatia match, but got little help from his teammates, which is essentially the problem for England, they don't play as a team. Gerrard was covered in mud by the end of the first half, anybody notice how Frank Lampard looked? Anybody notice that Frank Lampard was even playing? It's hard to inspire a bunch of prima donnas who are more worried about how they look then if they'll win or not. Furthermore, who cares? It's England, not Liverpool, and I could care less if Gerrard ever put on a Three Lions shirt again.
To say Gerrard is not a leader is all the evidence I need that this idiot doesn't watch Liverpool matches and is not a LFC supporter. Where to begin? Let's see, what about March 31, 2001? Man U? Ring a bell? Probably not. September 15, 2001? Everton at Goodison? Just to give this guy a backlog of matches so he can learn something, here's a list:
October 16, 2001 at Dynamo Kiev, European Cup
February 3, 2003 vs Manchester United, League Cup Final, Cardiff
April 21, 2003 vs Charlton, Premiership
December 8, 2004 vs Olympiakos, Champions League
May 3, 2005 vs Chelsea, Champions League
April 29, 2005 vs Aston Villa, Premiership
May 25, 2005 vs AC Milan, Champions League Final, Istanbul
May 13, 2006 vs West Ham, FA Cup Final, Cardiff
April 18, 2007 vs Middlesborough, Premiership
This is just a few that stick out, rarely was there a better nor more inspirational and influential player when Gerrard was on the field between the beginning of the Premiership season in 2003 up until our last match versus Fulham. Go get a copy of each of these matches, son, and then make your cretinous claims. If match performances don't make a player world class, what does? He painted himself in a corner on that one.
This paragraph is a perfect example of this guy's inept understanding of football:
'Truly world class players deliver not only in their domestic league but on the INTERNATIONAL stage. Any player who does not deliver in the big tournaments cannot be considered world class. There are of course exceptions to this, such as George Best, who never got to play in a major tournament, but players like him are a special case. The whole idea of ‘world class ability’ needs to be redefined, and in my view, achievement on the international stage should be the main criterion.'
Name one 'world class player' who's proven himself on the international stage? Zidane? Uh, no, Zidane sort of had a bunch of other great players, most of them not French I might add, playing along side of him. In fact, this moron's inability to recognize Claude Makélélé as the most important 'French' player of the last dozen years proves he's a plonker. Don't believe me? How many cups and trophies did Zidane win after Makélélé left Real Madrid? Try zero, zilch, none and he did nothing in France without him either. This guy wouldn't know world class if it stabbed him in the chest. He has the nerve to call out Gerrard for lacking football intelligence, but he clearly hasn't a clue about the sport. Just because Stevie-G didn't take a dozen shots or score a hat-trick, doesn't mean anything. He's a box-to-box midfielder, not an attacking one. If you need dazzling displays than think about this, Steven Gerrard is the only English league-based player ever in the history of the game to score in a domestic league cup final, a domestic cup final, an UEFA cup final, and a Champions League final.
Every single other player on your list had other world class players playing with them. Ronaldinho and Pele each had about half a dozen world class players playing with them at one time or another, but they never have carried a side by themselves. Maradona? I seem to recall a player named Passarella, among others. It is Argentina after all. Cruyff had the van de Kerkhof brothers, Platini had Trésor & Papin, Beckenbauer had almost as many great players as the Brazilians and Argentinians in Sepp Maier, Gerd Müller, Berti Vogts, and Uli Hoeneß among others, and Puskás was part of the legendary Golden Team. Gerrard can't do it on his own and England has nobody in his class with either the ability nor desire to help him, which is just another reason I don't care if he plays for England. Maybe Rooney when healthy, but as long as he plays for Man U, a hangnail is legitimate enough of an injury to prevent him from playing for England. John Terry is great, but legitimate injuries have kept him scarce. Beckham is at least three years past and no one else has even the potential to reach that level. Michael Owen stopped caring when he started hanging out with the wrong crowd.
Furthermore, saying players should be judged by their international performances as to whether or not they are world class and then making an exception for George Best makes no sense. How can one say that those Northern Ireland sides that Best played on aren't better than England today? You can't and therefore you're argument becomes null and void. In fact, it just proves my argument that one world class player can only carry a side so far. To prove this guy has no class and just a wind-up ponce, he then goes on to criticize Steven Gerrard's post match comments. Make up your mind you loser, is he a footballer or a pundit?
I could reduce every article he writes to rubbish, but honestly, I have better things to do with my time. This person clearly lacks the intelligence to write 'hard-hitting critical analysis' of anything without using manipulative methods of spin and illogical reason to prove his point instead of having an objective outlook. He deserves all the proper attention of a child kicking and screaming because they aren't getting it in the first place. The humorous aspect is, he's not going against the grain at all, he's just a muppet with the mass media's hand up his ass. Gerrard is constantly ridiculed in the national press and Peter Crouch is consistently praised and Rafa questioned for the forward's scarce use. By the way, I won't be doing a daily today (obviously) because there's shit-all going on. Cheers.
If you want someone who ignores other's opinions and in fact, mocks the status quo, look no further than here. I consistently mock mass media released articles for their ignorant zealotry and purposely shut out the rest of the world when watching Liverpool matches, just so my opinion isn't persuaded by outside influence. I doubt this plonker even watches matches and his 'data' is primitive at best if not made-up. The difference between me and him is that I do the actual work and am able to write a critical article without spouting half-truths riddled with overbearing arrogance to justify my opinion. This lad clearly has a severe case of cognizant dissonance to go with his Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Let's take a gander at the front page of his site so I can prove my point. His first article is 'Croatia debacle proves one thing: Steven Gerrard is NOT world class.' If that's not a good laugh, I don't know what is. His opening sentence? 'Steven Gerrard’s abject ability as a Captain was exposed once again as England suffered ignominious defeat to Croatia.' Well, if that doesn't prove that this guy spends more time during a match looking in a mirror than he does actually watching a match, I don't know what does. He clearly isn't a Liverpool fan. Gerrard worked his ass off in the Croatia match, but got little help from his teammates, which is essentially the problem for England, they don't play as a team. Gerrard was covered in mud by the end of the first half, anybody notice how Frank Lampard looked? Anybody notice that Frank Lampard was even playing? It's hard to inspire a bunch of prima donnas who are more worried about how they look then if they'll win or not. Furthermore, who cares? It's England, not Liverpool, and I could care less if Gerrard ever put on a Three Lions shirt again.
To say Gerrard is not a leader is all the evidence I need that this idiot doesn't watch Liverpool matches and is not a LFC supporter. Where to begin? Let's see, what about March 31, 2001? Man U? Ring a bell? Probably not. September 15, 2001? Everton at Goodison? Just to give this guy a backlog of matches so he can learn something, here's a list:
October 16, 2001 at Dynamo Kiev, European Cup
February 3, 2003 vs Manchester United, League Cup Final, Cardiff
April 21, 2003 vs Charlton, Premiership
December 8, 2004 vs Olympiakos, Champions League
May 3, 2005 vs Chelsea, Champions League
April 29, 2005 vs Aston Villa, Premiership
May 25, 2005 vs AC Milan, Champions League Final, Istanbul
May 13, 2006 vs West Ham, FA Cup Final, Cardiff
April 18, 2007 vs Middlesborough, Premiership
This is just a few that stick out, rarely was there a better nor more inspirational and influential player when Gerrard was on the field between the beginning of the Premiership season in 2003 up until our last match versus Fulham. Go get a copy of each of these matches, son, and then make your cretinous claims. If match performances don't make a player world class, what does? He painted himself in a corner on that one.
This paragraph is a perfect example of this guy's inept understanding of football:
'Truly world class players deliver not only in their domestic league but on the INTERNATIONAL stage. Any player who does not deliver in the big tournaments cannot be considered world class. There are of course exceptions to this, such as George Best, who never got to play in a major tournament, but players like him are a special case. The whole idea of ‘world class ability’ needs to be redefined, and in my view, achievement on the international stage should be the main criterion.'
Name one 'world class player' who's proven himself on the international stage? Zidane? Uh, no, Zidane sort of had a bunch of other great players, most of them not French I might add, playing along side of him. In fact, this moron's inability to recognize Claude Makélélé as the most important 'French' player of the last dozen years proves he's a plonker. Don't believe me? How many cups and trophies did Zidane win after Makélélé left Real Madrid? Try zero, zilch, none and he did nothing in France without him either. This guy wouldn't know world class if it stabbed him in the chest. He has the nerve to call out Gerrard for lacking football intelligence, but he clearly hasn't a clue about the sport. Just because Stevie-G didn't take a dozen shots or score a hat-trick, doesn't mean anything. He's a box-to-box midfielder, not an attacking one. If you need dazzling displays than think about this, Steven Gerrard is the only English league-based player ever in the history of the game to score in a domestic league cup final, a domestic cup final, an UEFA cup final, and a Champions League final.
Every single other player on your list had other world class players playing with them. Ronaldinho and Pele each had about half a dozen world class players playing with them at one time or another, but they never have carried a side by themselves. Maradona? I seem to recall a player named Passarella, among others. It is Argentina after all. Cruyff had the van de Kerkhof brothers, Platini had Trésor & Papin, Beckenbauer had almost as many great players as the Brazilians and Argentinians in Sepp Maier, Gerd Müller, Berti Vogts, and Uli Hoeneß among others, and Puskás was part of the legendary Golden Team. Gerrard can't do it on his own and England has nobody in his class with either the ability nor desire to help him, which is just another reason I don't care if he plays for England. Maybe Rooney when healthy, but as long as he plays for Man U, a hangnail is legitimate enough of an injury to prevent him from playing for England. John Terry is great, but legitimate injuries have kept him scarce. Beckham is at least three years past and no one else has even the potential to reach that level. Michael Owen stopped caring when he started hanging out with the wrong crowd.
Furthermore, saying players should be judged by their international performances as to whether or not they are world class and then making an exception for George Best makes no sense. How can one say that those Northern Ireland sides that Best played on aren't better than England today? You can't and therefore you're argument becomes null and void. In fact, it just proves my argument that one world class player can only carry a side so far. To prove this guy has no class and just a wind-up ponce, he then goes on to criticize Steven Gerrard's post match comments. Make up your mind you loser, is he a footballer or a pundit?
I could reduce every article he writes to rubbish, but honestly, I have better things to do with my time. This person clearly lacks the intelligence to write 'hard-hitting critical analysis' of anything without using manipulative methods of spin and illogical reason to prove his point instead of having an objective outlook. He deserves all the proper attention of a child kicking and screaming because they aren't getting it in the first place. The humorous aspect is, he's not going against the grain at all, he's just a muppet with the mass media's hand up his ass. Gerrard is constantly ridiculed in the national press and Peter Crouch is consistently praised and Rafa questioned for the forward's scarce use. By the way, I won't be doing a daily today (obviously) because there's shit-all going on. Cheers.
Wednesday, November 21, 2007
Today's Banter: Pepe seeks to stop Healy, Torres title talk, Rafa outclasses Big Sam, & a tad more
As I alluded to in yesterday's daily, Pepe Reina might be setting himself up for a fall today when he starts in net for his native Spain. The match is meaningless for the Spaniards who have already booked their ticket to the 2008 Euro, but their opponent, Northern Ireland, need to win if they want any chance of advancing. Pepe may be looking to shut down David Healy, the hat-trick hero when Norn Iron beat La Furia Roja 3-2 in Belfast in September of last year, but it doesn't mean his teammates will have the same kind of commitment. I'm still hoping Aragonés plays younger players or ones that will at least care, I don't want Reina to get embarrassed.
Fernando Torres has made some interesting points lately. Most notably how our side has yet to play our best yet are only six points off the pace of league leaders Arsenal. He also claims that there is a 'winning mentality' ever present in the LFC locker room before matches. The problem with our side is that we may have a winning attitude at the offset, but as matches wear on and goals aren't produced, we begin to doubt ourselves instead of believing that as long as their is time on the clock, we'll still get it done. Finally, Torres gets a little cocky and says “From what I have seen so far in England we do not have anything to fear from any of our opponents for the title." That may be true, but there's no need to give our opponents more motivation to beat us.
In anticipation of our clash at St. James Park on Saturday, Tommy Smith at the Echo has taken a few stabs at 'Big' Sam Allardyce. It's not as if the Newcastle boss doesn't deserve it, he feels as if he has the right to criticize Rafa Benitez despite lacking the silverware to do so. As Smith mentions, the only accomplishment of Allardyce worth any sort of recognition was keeping Bolton up for six seasons and reaching the UEFA Cup once. 'Big' Sam would get a lot more respect from others if he learned to keep his mouth shut. In fact, I'd go even as far as to say he'd make a better manager for England than Steve McClaren.
Two of our players saw action yesterday. On-loan Robbie Threlfall helped Hereford United upset Leeds 1-0 in first round FA Cup action. The left back, who turns 20 on Sunday, started and played the entire match. Meanwhile, Javier Mascherano and Argentina suffered their first loss of World Cup qualifying to Colombia in Bogota. Carlos Tevez conveniently received a red card in the 25th minute and despite going up 1-0 on a brilliant strike from Lionel Messi, the Albicelestes failed to hold on, eventually succumbing 2-1. Cheers.
Fernando Torres has made some interesting points lately. Most notably how our side has yet to play our best yet are only six points off the pace of league leaders Arsenal. He also claims that there is a 'winning mentality' ever present in the LFC locker room before matches. The problem with our side is that we may have a winning attitude at the offset, but as matches wear on and goals aren't produced, we begin to doubt ourselves instead of believing that as long as their is time on the clock, we'll still get it done. Finally, Torres gets a little cocky and says “From what I have seen so far in England we do not have anything to fear from any of our opponents for the title." That may be true, but there's no need to give our opponents more motivation to beat us.
In anticipation of our clash at St. James Park on Saturday, Tommy Smith at the Echo has taken a few stabs at 'Big' Sam Allardyce. It's not as if the Newcastle boss doesn't deserve it, he feels as if he has the right to criticize Rafa Benitez despite lacking the silverware to do so. As Smith mentions, the only accomplishment of Allardyce worth any sort of recognition was keeping Bolton up for six seasons and reaching the UEFA Cup once. 'Big' Sam would get a lot more respect from others if he learned to keep his mouth shut. In fact, I'd go even as far as to say he'd make a better manager for England than Steve McClaren.
Two of our players saw action yesterday. On-loan Robbie Threlfall helped Hereford United upset Leeds 1-0 in first round FA Cup action. The left back, who turns 20 on Sunday, started and played the entire match. Meanwhile, Javier Mascherano and Argentina suffered their first loss of World Cup qualifying to Colombia in Bogota. Carlos Tevez conveniently received a red card in the 25th minute and despite going up 1-0 on a brilliant strike from Lionel Messi, the Albicelestes failed to hold on, eventually succumbing 2-1. Cheers.
The genius of Rafa shines through Ryan Babel
As I mentioned in my last post, I've been tediously mulling over data during the international break, the extent of which might deem me certifiably insane. Basically I'm trying to create a 'performance database' for each and every player on our squad in an attempt to quantify as many determinants as possible to figure out what would be their optimal situation to provide maximum performance. I would probably go as far as including elements such as what they ate and at what time on match days if I could get a hold of such data, but as for now, I'm going to stick with basic corporeal information.Though I've barely built a foundation hardly worthy of drawing any thorough conclusions, today I decided to attempt to assess Rafa's seemingly erratic use of Ryan Babel. When you take a young, inexperienced player with immense talent like Babel, it's usually best to slowly ease him into a new competitive environment as intense and grueling as the Premiership. Rafa has appeared to have done an astounding job, delicately and almost nonchalantly allowing the young Dutchman to familiarize himself with new challenges on his own. Statistically, the results have been more than just positive, they've been extraordinary.
Most sides would probably start Babel and play him as much as possible, but Rafa has the convenience of a deep squad with many players who can occupy the left flank and forward positions. Such comfort afforded our gaffer to use Babel in advantageous situations where he's most likely to utilize his talents to produce positive results and increase his confidence. The 20-year-old has only played in 16 of our 20 matches for a total of 809 minutes by way of 7 starts and 9 substitution appearances. That breaks down to roughly 50 minutes per tie, which is important when computing his contribution per a full appearance in comparison to the team's overall average output.
The data speaks for itself, when Babel is on, we appear to be a better attacking side. As a squad our standard performance consists of 2 goals with 15.3 shots, 6.5 on-goal. Our possession percentage, passing rate, and territorial advantage is 55.7%, 76.8%, and 50.6% respectively. With Babel on the pitch, all those numbers increase, some significantly. Our goals per match average increases to 2.46 on 7.9 shots-on and 17.14 attempts overall. As for the percentage stats, possession swells to 58.2%, passing rate ups to 77.9%, and territorial advantage increases to 51.1%. We average a goal every 36.8 minutes he plays. It's pretty clear that the winger/forward is quite the catalyst in our offensive forays.
Where it gets even more interesting is on defense. Babel clearly isn't much of a contributor at the other end of the pitch, but in using the 'best defense is a good offense' logic, the most telling stat that he positively effects our defensive output is the fact that, as a side, our goals against per match decreases from 0.65 to 0.53 when he's on. Taking in consideration that the obvious circumstances of statistics such as possession percentage and territorial advantage increasing for our side results in a decrease for the opposition and that a total of only 5 goals have been scored against us when Babel is playing, he's arguably just as valuable as any of our defenders.
As our season wears on, I don't expect Babel's role to change. He'll get the occasional start, particularly when cup matches come around, but for the most part I expect him to maintain his super sub status. Just because our team is a better attacking side when he's on the pitch, doesn't mean we should keep him on as much as possible. The genius of Rafa is knowing when and where to use certain players to best help the club. He's proven it with Steven Gerrard, Steve Finnan, John Arne Riise, Alvaro Arbeloa, Fernando Torres, even Craig Bellamy in the past, and now he's affirming it with Babel.
Tuesday, November 20, 2007
Five interesting stat facts from the season so far
For the past few days I've been mulling over data from the obscure to the obvious for a number of reasons. I really want to get an idea of the contributions each player makes to the whole, who's the most efficient at which position, and most specifically, what players work best with one another. It also reveals some trends that are more than likely coincidental, but interesting nonetheless. Here's five of them:
1. youth + height = win
Though it rarely happens, when Rafa puts out a side that is younger yet taller than the opposition, we win. Four times so far this season it's occurred: Toulouse (2nd leg), Derby County, Cardiff City, and Fulham. Of course this means little considering the opponent and the fact that they were all played at Anfield.
2. Goals are scarce at Anfield?
If you take away Toulouse, Derby, and Besitkas, we've only scored 8 goals in 7 matches at home this season. Not that we've been much better on the road. Take away the Reading match and we've only managed 10 goals in 9 matches away from Anfield.
3. Our most dominating performance of the season was a scoreless draw at home
You read that right, our most dominating performance was the 0-0 draw against Birmingham at Anfield. In that match we had our highest possession percentage at 71.5%, and both our second highest pass success rate (81.9%) and territorial advantage (56.8%). We also had our most corners won at 11. So why didn't we win nor score? Our shooting was piss poor. We had 4 shots on goal the entire match, 3 right in front of the net.
4. Statistically our worst performance was a draw on the road
You know, I didn't think we played that bad at Porto, but the numbers tell a whole different story. In fact, we had no right even taking a point. How bad were we? Try one shot on goal, a single corner kick won, a possession percentage of 43.5%, and a passing rate of 64.2%. All four of those stats were season lows. Pennant's red card didn't help either. The amazing part is that Porto needed a penalty just to get the draw.
5. The Riise factor
This is one of those odd stats where there's much more at play than just one simple movement, but it is sort of eye-opening. In the 5 matches that John Arne Riise has had to move to left-back due to substitution reasons, we've scored 8 goals... in 130 minutes. If Rafa could somehow tap into this trend, we could average more than three goals a match, rather than 2 as we do now. Of course, there are two other factors that play into this that aren't present at the beginning or during an entire match. First, fresh players are brought in to revitalize the attack and second, the opposition has tired out a bit.
These are just some odd bits I've come across so far and I have a ton of more work to do, but I hope to have a better feel for our side when it's all said and done. Expect more interesting tidbits in the near future. Cheers.
1. youth + height = win
Though it rarely happens, when Rafa puts out a side that is younger yet taller than the opposition, we win. Four times so far this season it's occurred: Toulouse (2nd leg), Derby County, Cardiff City, and Fulham. Of course this means little considering the opponent and the fact that they were all played at Anfield.
2. Goals are scarce at Anfield?
If you take away Toulouse, Derby, and Besitkas, we've only scored 8 goals in 7 matches at home this season. Not that we've been much better on the road. Take away the Reading match and we've only managed 10 goals in 9 matches away from Anfield.
3. Our most dominating performance of the season was a scoreless draw at home
You read that right, our most dominating performance was the 0-0 draw against Birmingham at Anfield. In that match we had our highest possession percentage at 71.5%, and both our second highest pass success rate (81.9%) and territorial advantage (56.8%). We also had our most corners won at 11. So why didn't we win nor score? Our shooting was piss poor. We had 4 shots on goal the entire match, 3 right in front of the net.
4. Statistically our worst performance was a draw on the road
You know, I didn't think we played that bad at Porto, but the numbers tell a whole different story. In fact, we had no right even taking a point. How bad were we? Try one shot on goal, a single corner kick won, a possession percentage of 43.5%, and a passing rate of 64.2%. All four of those stats were season lows. Pennant's red card didn't help either. The amazing part is that Porto needed a penalty just to get the draw.
5. The Riise factor
This is one of those odd stats where there's much more at play than just one simple movement, but it is sort of eye-opening. In the 5 matches that John Arne Riise has had to move to left-back due to substitution reasons, we've scored 8 goals... in 130 minutes. If Rafa could somehow tap into this trend, we could average more than three goals a match, rather than 2 as we do now. Of course, there are two other factors that play into this that aren't present at the beginning or during an entire match. First, fresh players are brought in to revitalize the attack and second, the opposition has tired out a bit.
These are just some odd bits I've come across so far and I have a ton of more work to do, but I hope to have a better feel for our side when it's all said and done. Expect more interesting tidbits in the near future. Cheers.
Monday, November 19, 2007
Today's Banter: Kewell survives Nigeria, No interest in Javi Martínez, West Ham want Hobbs? & more
Probably the best news to come out of the weekend was Harry Kewell playing the full match for Australia. The 29-year-old started on the wing for the Socceroos as they beat Nigeria 1-0 at Wembley. Interim manager Rob Baan hopes this helps Kewell get more time and play more often for us. Obviously he's not too familiar with the ways of Rafa.
I don't know where the rumors of our interest in Athletic Bilbao central midfielder Javi Martínez emanated from, but they've been rubbished by Rafa Benitez. I thought it was a bit strange that we were going after the 19-year-old with the amount of players we already have at that position. This pretty much scratches any chance of a move for Momo in the January window, something I'm against anyhow.
There's a little disinformation in this article regarding West Ham's interest in obtaining Jack Hobbs on loan in January. He actually has made his first team debut. In fact, I believe he's played three matches overall for us, one start and two subs, but that aside, I think it'd be a great idea to let him go to the Hammers on a six month loan. He might actually get some pitch time there and if he's as good as everyone says, they won't include an option to make it permanent. I've yet to be impressed by the lad myself, but it's not like he's really had a chance to 'settle in' with the first team.
Finally, in other transfer news it's been reported here that the £17m quoted as the transfer fee for Javier Mascherano may also include his salary over five years. Not sure how that'll work out and it sort of makes little sense, but I hope he's not getting screwed over by MSI and Kia Joorabchian. In that same article is another reference to Racing Santander centre back Ezequiel Garay, who I have to believe is our top target in January. Cheers.
I don't know where the rumors of our interest in Athletic Bilbao central midfielder Javi Martínez emanated from, but they've been rubbished by Rafa Benitez. I thought it was a bit strange that we were going after the 19-year-old with the amount of players we already have at that position. This pretty much scratches any chance of a move for Momo in the January window, something I'm against anyhow.
There's a little disinformation in this article regarding West Ham's interest in obtaining Jack Hobbs on loan in January. He actually has made his first team debut. In fact, I believe he's played three matches overall for us, one start and two subs, but that aside, I think it'd be a great idea to let him go to the Hammers on a six month loan. He might actually get some pitch time there and if he's as good as everyone says, they won't include an option to make it permanent. I've yet to be impressed by the lad myself, but it's not like he's really had a chance to 'settle in' with the first team.
Finally, in other transfer news it's been reported here that the £17m quoted as the transfer fee for Javier Mascherano may also include his salary over five years. Not sure how that'll work out and it sort of makes little sense, but I hope he's not getting screwed over by MSI and Kia Joorabchian. In that same article is another reference to Racing Santander centre back Ezequiel Garay, who I have to believe is our top target in January. Cheers.
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Today's Banter: One part wind-up, two parts wind-down, & 44/100% certifiable
All appears quiet on the Liverpool front, which is fine by me, but apparently not so for the wind-up bloggers. There's this one site in particular that holds contests for it's 'writers' to see who can attract the most hits. Basically it's who can write the most outrageous title followed-up by the most inane, speculative garbage that any half-witted teenager could author. One of these 'articles' is about how Steven Gerrard doesn't deserve a starting spot on a fully fit Liverpool squad. Yes, they are that feeble-minded.
Another 'article' attempts to blame Liverpool and more specifically Rafa for the supposed stunted development of Momo Sissoko. He didn't have to sign that contract extension this past summer and furthermore he's had two major injuries in his first two seasons with us, but let's leave facts to the thinkers. For this bullocks to stop, please make an effort to ignore these imbeciles. Don't click on their articles and definitely don't comment. It'd be nice if they dropped dead, but that would be asking way too much, so ignoring them is the best way to go about. They don't write such rubbish for the good of anyone but themselves. Moving on...
According to this article, Mascherano is close to signing a five year, £17m contract. Well, this is news to me. I know his transfer fee is around that amount, which we obviously have to pay first, but I didn't know we've already negotiated a contract with him. Of course, this is the first article I've read that's mention such notions, so someone might just have their facts wrong, intentional or not. Another part of that article I've yet to hear is Mascherano 'insisted he would leave Anfield unless a deal was finalised within a month.' Really? Hmmm....
Tony Barrett of the Liverpool Echo has written a short but sweet article praising Alvaro Arbeloa. He basically just reiterates a lot of what's already been said of the Spaniard by myself and other bloggers. One thing I slightly disagree with is how he thinks that Arbeloa is better on the left. To me, he appears more comfortable on the right and gets more involved on attack when he's over there. I chalk it up to him having more confidence on that side to get back on defense. Barrett even goes as far as to compare Arbeloa with Stevie Nicol.
Speaking of which, Nicol's New England Revolution face the Houston Dynamo in the MLS Cup final today in a repeat of last year's match-up. The Revolution have already won the US Cup this season and will be looking to complete the double in Washington, DC, where the match is being held. As painful as it is for me to watch MLS, I'll probably take in this one. Nothing really better to do, actually.
Finally, I can't end my daily without mentioning an article or post by a questionably mental Man U or Chelsea fan. That would be unforgivable. Today we have a Chelsea supporter from the ever reputable site Vital Chelsea. If you've ever visited that veritable armpit of the world wide web, you'd know that it's one of the more dim-witted sites around. The most humorous aspect is that it's supposed to be a place for Chelsea fans to write about their own side, but most of their articles are usually about Liverpool. I guess when you don't have much of a history nor brain cells, you get short on subjects. Anyhow, this clown starts off writing about how a reporter from the Echo chastises Michael Essien for not apologizing for a vicious yellow card-earning tackle on Leon Osman last Sunday and then ends up talking about Didi Hamann and Dirk Kuyt. What?! Oh, because the paper is in Liverpool. Brilliant. Yeah, Evertonians and Liverpool fans are one in the same, just like Chelsea supporters are the same as Fulham fans. I mean, Chelsea is in Fulham after all. Cheers.
Another 'article' attempts to blame Liverpool and more specifically Rafa for the supposed stunted development of Momo Sissoko. He didn't have to sign that contract extension this past summer and furthermore he's had two major injuries in his first two seasons with us, but let's leave facts to the thinkers. For this bullocks to stop, please make an effort to ignore these imbeciles. Don't click on their articles and definitely don't comment. It'd be nice if they dropped dead, but that would be asking way too much, so ignoring them is the best way to go about. They don't write such rubbish for the good of anyone but themselves. Moving on...
According to this article, Mascherano is close to signing a five year, £17m contract. Well, this is news to me. I know his transfer fee is around that amount, which we obviously have to pay first, but I didn't know we've already negotiated a contract with him. Of course, this is the first article I've read that's mention such notions, so someone might just have their facts wrong, intentional or not. Another part of that article I've yet to hear is Mascherano 'insisted he would leave Anfield unless a deal was finalised within a month.' Really? Hmmm....
Tony Barrett of the Liverpool Echo has written a short but sweet article praising Alvaro Arbeloa. He basically just reiterates a lot of what's already been said of the Spaniard by myself and other bloggers. One thing I slightly disagree with is how he thinks that Arbeloa is better on the left. To me, he appears more comfortable on the right and gets more involved on attack when he's over there. I chalk it up to him having more confidence on that side to get back on defense. Barrett even goes as far as to compare Arbeloa with Stevie Nicol.
Speaking of which, Nicol's New England Revolution face the Houston Dynamo in the MLS Cup final today in a repeat of last year's match-up. The Revolution have already won the US Cup this season and will be looking to complete the double in Washington, DC, where the match is being held. As painful as it is for me to watch MLS, I'll probably take in this one. Nothing really better to do, actually.
Finally, I can't end my daily without mentioning an article or post by a questionably mental Man U or Chelsea fan. That would be unforgivable. Today we have a Chelsea supporter from the ever reputable site Vital Chelsea. If you've ever visited that veritable armpit of the world wide web, you'd know that it's one of the more dim-witted sites around. The most humorous aspect is that it's supposed to be a place for Chelsea fans to write about their own side, but most of their articles are usually about Liverpool. I guess when you don't have much of a history nor brain cells, you get short on subjects. Anyhow, this clown starts off writing about how a reporter from the Echo chastises Michael Essien for not apologizing for a vicious yellow card-earning tackle on Leon Osman last Sunday and then ends up talking about Didi Hamann and Dirk Kuyt. What?! Oh, because the paper is in Liverpool. Brilliant. Yeah, Evertonians and Liverpool fans are one in the same, just like Chelsea supporters are the same as Fulham fans. I mean, Chelsea is in Fulham after all. Cheers.
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Today's Banter: Carra praises Hyypiä & Reina, Bayern wants Benitez, Javi responds, & more
With all the time he's got on his hands these days, Jamie Carragher has decided to give somewhat of a state-of-the-club address with particular praise for his centre back partner and Pepe Reina. Carra makes a good point that taking eight points from a run of Goodison, Arsenal, Ewood, and Fulham at Anfield is a decent string of results. He then goes on to point out how Hyypiä has raised his level of play recently, something that hasn't gone unnoticed, but also adds that it seems when the Finn plays well, the whole team appears to follow suit. That's something I haven't really recognized, but come to think of it, he may be right. Finally, the man from Bootle calls Pepe Reina one of the three best keepers in the world along with Petr Čech and Gianluigi Buffon, as well as the best he's ever played with. Good call, Carra, way to schmooze your teammates so close to Christmas and all.
Apparently Bayern Munich wants Rafa to replace Ottmar Hitzfeld at the end of the season. I won't even address such rubbish, Bayern is no where near the club they once were just six or seven years ago and Rafa is investing too much time and energy to be lured away by what's frankly a lesser club.
Moving on, one of our transfer targets, Javi Martínez of Athletic Bilbao, appears to be open to a move to the Premiership, but wants to do what's best for his club and himself. Sounds to me as if he's going to go elsewhere, he wants his current club to make a substantial financial gain for doing so. I've got to wonder that if he's not a true winger or can even be effective on the flank, do we really need another central midfielder? I think not, unless Rafa has something up his sleeve like selling Momo, but I doubt it.
Finally, we have a delusional and ill-informed Man U fan trying to compare their debt issues to ours. Sorry, but as usual, a Man U failed to do the actual work and tried to pass half-assed biased opinion for fact. The Red Devils (not Reds, mind you) have a current debt of at least £660m, stemming from the Glazers refinancing in July of 2006, so it could actually be more than that, especially if you consider the amount they spent on players this past summer and that the Glazers will probably do their best to keep the fans and media in the dark about financial matters at the club due the negative light it tends to shed. Liverpool's debt currently sits at around £300m, but the owners are will have to refinance soon to fund the building of the new stadium. At most it will increase to around £520m, which is still well less than the Mancs. I realize that misery loves company, but I refuse to be dragged into the hell of ignorance that epitomizes the typical Man U 'fan'. Cheers.
Apparently Bayern Munich wants Rafa to replace Ottmar Hitzfeld at the end of the season. I won't even address such rubbish, Bayern is no where near the club they once were just six or seven years ago and Rafa is investing too much time and energy to be lured away by what's frankly a lesser club.
Moving on, one of our transfer targets, Javi Martínez of Athletic Bilbao, appears to be open to a move to the Premiership, but wants to do what's best for his club and himself. Sounds to me as if he's going to go elsewhere, he wants his current club to make a substantial financial gain for doing so. I've got to wonder that if he's not a true winger or can even be effective on the flank, do we really need another central midfielder? I think not, unless Rafa has something up his sleeve like selling Momo, but I doubt it.
Finally, we have a delusional and ill-informed Man U fan trying to compare their debt issues to ours. Sorry, but as usual, a Man U failed to do the actual work and tried to pass half-assed biased opinion for fact. The Red Devils (not Reds, mind you) have a current debt of at least £660m, stemming from the Glazers refinancing in July of 2006, so it could actually be more than that, especially if you consider the amount they spent on players this past summer and that the Glazers will probably do their best to keep the fans and media in the dark about financial matters at the club due the negative light it tends to shed. Liverpool's debt currently sits at around £300m, but the owners are will have to refinance soon to fund the building of the new stadium. At most it will increase to around £520m, which is still well less than the Mancs. I realize that misery loves company, but I refuse to be dragged into the hell of ignorance that epitomizes the typical Man U 'fan'. Cheers.
Friday, November 16, 2007
Today's Banter: Sissoko to Everton?, Crouch departure looks likely, Kewell may start for Socceroos, & more
Well, this is quite alarming. Apparently David Moyes is interested in bringing Momo Sissoko to Everton. Why do I get the feeling that this is going to spark Toffee cries that Liverpool stole him away from them in the first place? Of course they just want to ignore the fact that he played under Rafa at Valencia. As for this rumor, I'm going to have to give it the Heston treatment and say, 'From my cold dead hands!' There's just no way Rafa can allow a talent of Momo's proportion to go not only to our friends in blue, but to any Premiership side.
Apparently Sissoko wants to talk over his future with Benitez, which I'm sure will just lead to the Malian announcing that he's got to work harder or some rubbish of the sort, but if he does go elsewhere, it's best he goes to Italy or Spain. I personally want him to stay, as his athleticism could eventually be an asset to allow him to be more than just a defensive midfielder, as he showed in the preseason. Plus at times he's a beast on the pitch and with the motivation that our side didn't think he was good enough for us, I'm sure he won't be very fun to face. Not to mention recklessly dangerous.
Word is Rafa is tired of Crouch's ego and is looking to sell him in the January transfer window. Do you hear that? Are you sure? Well, it's a heavenly host of angels in my head singing glorious psalms of triumph. Who needs coffee when you've got news like this? With that said, Rafa will probably come out sometime next week and say that Crouch is, in fact, not for sale, crushing my hopes. Well, apparently his valuation has been set at £10m and among those interested are Newcastle, Portsmouth, and Aston Villa. I would just like to ask those clubs not to give in to the good fight and if it'll help, I'll donate a couple of quid to their cause. By the way, unlike Momo, I would pray that other clubs would play Crouch against us. One less player to worry about.
Any hopes of Harry Kewell not seeing action for Australia tomorrow have appeared to've been dashed. Apparently Tim Cahill is unfit to play which will move Kewell into a starting role. So he has yet to start for Liverpool this season, but he may for the Socceroos? I can't say that I'm shocked. Anyways, I'll be keeping tabs on the situation on Saturday and may even watch the match. Stay fit, King Harry... please.
Now for the fun stuff. Steven Gerrard is once again the slag flavor of the month for his so-called 'xenophobic' comments regarding a foreigner quota in the Premiership. First off, the fact that this is getting any attention is just pure rubbish. All he said was that it might be something to look into, that's it, but I realize it's Stevie-G, the greatest player in the world, and everything he says is front-page news that sells copy. Fine, whatever. The best thing is when complete morons chime in on their opinion, believing they know what Gerrard said, which, let me assure you, they don't. They weren't there and didn't ask Stevie himself. Muppets.
Patrice Evra is apparently one of them. The French International has been quoted as saying that Man U have more England Internationals than Liverpool. I just love it when Senegalese players... what? What was that? He's French? But... Really though, Patrice? Let's look into that for a second. I'm looking at the latest squad selection right now and I only see one Man U player, Wes 'I'm having a laugh' Brown, and two LFC players, Crouch and Gerrard. Last time I checked, two was more than one. Oh, wait, do you mean players with caps for England? This will be fun.
Let's start with Gary Neville. Gary Neville? Paging Gary Neville? Nevermind. Then you have Wes Brown... hold on... I can't stop laughing... Jamie Carragher is ten times the player Brown would ever hope to be. Michael Carrick? B team at best. Hargreaves? Like I said yesterday, he only has knee cartilage for his club. Kieran Richardson? Oh, wait, nevermind. Rooney? Always seems injured when his country comes a-calling. That leaves Rio Ferdinand, who, unlike last year, is well-deserving of a spot to represent his country, but alas, he's suspended. So there you go, Man U's latest contribution to England in a nutshell. Stick with being a cheat Evra, you're good at that. It's in your Senegalese, uh, I mean French blood.
Finally, we have another good laugh when this bloke tries to say Jermaine Jenas is as good as Steven Gerrard. Of course, Jenas is more of a holding midfielder and Gerrard is a true box-to-box, but let's ignore that. Also, Gerrard plays in more matches for club and country and has scored more goals overall, but let's just manipulate the data to prove our point. No manager in the world would take Jenas over Gerrard and if he did, he'd be an unemployed manager. Cheers.
Apparently Sissoko wants to talk over his future with Benitez, which I'm sure will just lead to the Malian announcing that he's got to work harder or some rubbish of the sort, but if he does go elsewhere, it's best he goes to Italy or Spain. I personally want him to stay, as his athleticism could eventually be an asset to allow him to be more than just a defensive midfielder, as he showed in the preseason. Plus at times he's a beast on the pitch and with the motivation that our side didn't think he was good enough for us, I'm sure he won't be very fun to face. Not to mention recklessly dangerous.
Word is Rafa is tired of Crouch's ego and is looking to sell him in the January transfer window. Do you hear that? Are you sure? Well, it's a heavenly host of angels in my head singing glorious psalms of triumph. Who needs coffee when you've got news like this? With that said, Rafa will probably come out sometime next week and say that Crouch is, in fact, not for sale, crushing my hopes. Well, apparently his valuation has been set at £10m and among those interested are Newcastle, Portsmouth, and Aston Villa. I would just like to ask those clubs not to give in to the good fight and if it'll help, I'll donate a couple of quid to their cause. By the way, unlike Momo, I would pray that other clubs would play Crouch against us. One less player to worry about.
Any hopes of Harry Kewell not seeing action for Australia tomorrow have appeared to've been dashed. Apparently Tim Cahill is unfit to play which will move Kewell into a starting role. So he has yet to start for Liverpool this season, but he may for the Socceroos? I can't say that I'm shocked. Anyways, I'll be keeping tabs on the situation on Saturday and may even watch the match. Stay fit, King Harry... please.
Now for the fun stuff. Steven Gerrard is once again the slag flavor of the month for his so-called 'xenophobic' comments regarding a foreigner quota in the Premiership. First off, the fact that this is getting any attention is just pure rubbish. All he said was that it might be something to look into, that's it, but I realize it's Stevie-G, the greatest player in the world, and everything he says is front-page news that sells copy. Fine, whatever. The best thing is when complete morons chime in on their opinion, believing they know what Gerrard said, which, let me assure you, they don't. They weren't there and didn't ask Stevie himself. Muppets.
Patrice Evra is apparently one of them. The French International has been quoted as saying that Man U have more England Internationals than Liverpool. I just love it when Senegalese players... what? What was that? He's French? But... Really though, Patrice? Let's look into that for a second. I'm looking at the latest squad selection right now and I only see one Man U player, Wes 'I'm having a laugh' Brown, and two LFC players, Crouch and Gerrard. Last time I checked, two was more than one. Oh, wait, do you mean players with caps for England? This will be fun.
Let's start with Gary Neville. Gary Neville? Paging Gary Neville? Nevermind. Then you have Wes Brown... hold on... I can't stop laughing... Jamie Carragher is ten times the player Brown would ever hope to be. Michael Carrick? B team at best. Hargreaves? Like I said yesterday, he only has knee cartilage for his club. Kieran Richardson? Oh, wait, nevermind. Rooney? Always seems injured when his country comes a-calling. That leaves Rio Ferdinand, who, unlike last year, is well-deserving of a spot to represent his country, but alas, he's suspended. So there you go, Man U's latest contribution to England in a nutshell. Stick with being a cheat Evra, you're good at that. It's in your Senegalese, uh, I mean French blood.
Finally, we have another good laugh when this bloke tries to say Jermaine Jenas is as good as Steven Gerrard. Of course, Jenas is more of a holding midfielder and Gerrard is a true box-to-box, but let's ignore that. Also, Gerrard plays in more matches for club and country and has scored more goals overall, but let's just manipulate the data to prove our point. No manager in the world would take Jenas over Gerrard and if he did, he'd be an unemployed manager. Cheers.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Busting the 'big spending' Benitez myth
I love the 'wind-up' blogs, don't you? The ones that end their post titles with lots of exclamation marks or just have a moronically vague title like 'Is Rafa crazy???' Yes, he is. Wow, that took more brain power than the content of the actual post. Anyhow, earlier this week, some idiot, who claimed to be a Liverpool fan by the way, referred to Rafa as a 'big spender.' I nearly lost the plot I laughed so hard. I wonder, does anyone actually think that? If so, let me rather easily convince you otherwise.
For sake of argument, let's take the period between Rafa's hiring and the end of last season to analyze how much of a spender Benitez is compared to the other big four managers. Rafa was hired in June of 2004, so for instance, I won't include the amount earned through the sale of Emile Heskey since it occurred in May of that year. I also won't include the transactions of this past summer since their affect is of yet not quantifiable in the terms I aim to utilize.
Between the period of his hiring and the final whistle of the Champions League final last May, Rafa had paid out roughly £80 for 16 players, from Josemi to the loan-fee of Javier Mascherano. During that same period, he sold £43m worth of players, 13 in all, from Danny Murphy to Stephen Warnock. I didn't include Djibril Cisse since technically he wasn't sold until this past July. That's a difference of approximately £37m for 1 major trophy (2005 Champions League) and 1 minor trophy (2006 FA Cup).
During that same time frame, Sir Alex Ferguson spent around £75m on 9 players, from Wayne Rooney to Michael Carrick, and rid himself of 8 players for roughly £26m, Van Nistelrooy to Real Madrid being a large chunk of that. That's a difference of approximately £49 for 1 major trophy (2007 Premiership) and 1 minor trophy (2006 League Cup). The same amount of cups won by Benitez only at £12m more.
Jose Mourinho, who joined Chelsea the same summer as Rafa took the Liverpool job, has spent a whopping £209m on players and sold £49m worth. That's a difference of £160m for 2 major trophies (2005, 2006 EPL) and 3 minor trophies (2005, 2007 League Cup & 2007 FA Cup). That's basically £32m per trophy, roughly £8m more per than Ferguson, and a little more than twice as much as Benitez.
The undisputed king of getting the most bang for your buck is Wenger though. The Arsenal manager has spent around £29m during Rafa's reign and, thanks in large part to the sale of Patrick Vieria to Juventus in the summer of 2005, has received roughly £27m for departures. Of course all he has to show for it is the 2005 FA Cup and a 2006 Champions League second place medal, but that's what £2m will get you these days.
Clearly Rafa has not been a 'big spender' and has done wonders with the limited funds and players provided. If one wants to call him a 'big spender' after this summer, well, that's mythical as well. He may have bought 5 players (Lucas, Leto, Torres, Benayoun, & Babel) for a total of £43.5m, but he also sold 4 players (Gonzo, Bellamy, Garcia, & Cisse) for £21m. Compared to Sir Alex at Man U, who spent somewhere in the ballpark of £50-60m depending on how much the Tevez loan fee actually was, £22.5m is chump change.
(By the way, all the data used in this post was collected through hard work. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the official financial data of any club, so I had to peruse numerous sources, checking and re-checking figures I might add. If you'd like to take the time to prove my numbers otherwise, well, I'd appreciate it and make the proper corrections. Otherwise, comments questioning the figures presented will be rubbished. Good day!)
For sake of argument, let's take the period between Rafa's hiring and the end of last season to analyze how much of a spender Benitez is compared to the other big four managers. Rafa was hired in June of 2004, so for instance, I won't include the amount earned through the sale of Emile Heskey since it occurred in May of that year. I also won't include the transactions of this past summer since their affect is of yet not quantifiable in the terms I aim to utilize.
Between the period of his hiring and the final whistle of the Champions League final last May, Rafa had paid out roughly £80 for 16 players, from Josemi to the loan-fee of Javier Mascherano. During that same period, he sold £43m worth of players, 13 in all, from Danny Murphy to Stephen Warnock. I didn't include Djibril Cisse since technically he wasn't sold until this past July. That's a difference of approximately £37m for 1 major trophy (2005 Champions League) and 1 minor trophy (2006 FA Cup).
During that same time frame, Sir Alex Ferguson spent around £75m on 9 players, from Wayne Rooney to Michael Carrick, and rid himself of 8 players for roughly £26m, Van Nistelrooy to Real Madrid being a large chunk of that. That's a difference of approximately £49 for 1 major trophy (2007 Premiership) and 1 minor trophy (2006 League Cup). The same amount of cups won by Benitez only at £12m more.
Jose Mourinho, who joined Chelsea the same summer as Rafa took the Liverpool job, has spent a whopping £209m on players and sold £49m worth. That's a difference of £160m for 2 major trophies (2005, 2006 EPL) and 3 minor trophies (2005, 2007 League Cup & 2007 FA Cup). That's basically £32m per trophy, roughly £8m more per than Ferguson, and a little more than twice as much as Benitez.
The undisputed king of getting the most bang for your buck is Wenger though. The Arsenal manager has spent around £29m during Rafa's reign and, thanks in large part to the sale of Patrick Vieria to Juventus in the summer of 2005, has received roughly £27m for departures. Of course all he has to show for it is the 2005 FA Cup and a 2006 Champions League second place medal, but that's what £2m will get you these days.
Clearly Rafa has not been a 'big spender' and has done wonders with the limited funds and players provided. If one wants to call him a 'big spender' after this summer, well, that's mythical as well. He may have bought 5 players (Lucas, Leto, Torres, Benayoun, & Babel) for a total of £43.5m, but he also sold 4 players (Gonzo, Bellamy, Garcia, & Cisse) for £21m. Compared to Sir Alex at Man U, who spent somewhere in the ballpark of £50-60m depending on how much the Tevez loan fee actually was, £22.5m is chump change.
(By the way, all the data used in this post was collected through hard work. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the official financial data of any club, so I had to peruse numerous sources, checking and re-checking figures I might add. If you'd like to take the time to prove my numbers otherwise, well, I'd appreciate it and make the proper corrections. Otherwise, comments questioning the figures presented will be rubbished. Good day!)
Today's Banter: Bellamy named Welsh FOY, BBC half-ass apologizes, Injury update, & more
Congratulations to Craig Bellamy who was named Footballer of the Year for Wales, beating out the likes of Ryan Giggs and Gareth Bale. Anytime a Liverpool player, former or not, beats out a Man U player for something, the sun seems to shine a little brighter. It was the first time the 28-year-old striker has won the award. The always humble Bells was surprised to win, but thought he was more deserving in previous years. I sometimes wonder if he was still with our side, what kind of contribution he'd make. Outside of leading the club in offside calls that is.
The BBC just doesn't get it. In their apology for an Eastenders character making remarks about Heysel, Hillsborough, and hooliganism, they claim it was 'misinterpreted.' Any chance of such a notion should be avoided when referencing such a sensitive subject. The causes and the consequences of those events are much too complicated for a television show to handle in just a matter of a couple of lines. Stick to the lame-ass imaginary story lines and stop trying to mix in reality where real people were/are killed and other real people were/are traumatized because of it. Moving on...
There's a good chance that Daniel Agger will be back for the Newcastle match at St. James Park. The 22-year-old Dane is expected to return to full training next week. Since Hyypiä will probably play for Finland next Tuesday, the young centre back's return couldn't come at a better time. Yossi Benayoun could be back in action for the Tyneside tie as well, but Xabi Alonso will be at least an additional week if not more.
In transfer market news, Rafa is ready to sell Scott Carson to Villa if the club are prepared to meet his valuation. It is thought that Benitez wants at least £9m for him. I wonder if we waited until the summer, we could get a bit more for him, especially since Arsene Wenger is an admirer and is in need of a better goalie. Of course, if we could use that money to sign Masche on a permanent, there's no question we should sell.
Sticking to transfers, we are apparently interested in Juventus defender Jonathan Zebina. The 29-year-old Frenchman has apparently fallen out of favor with Claudio Reyna at the Old Lady and could be available in the January transfer window. He can play both right-back and central defense. I say if the price is right, why not? The more the merrier, as long as he doesn't mind not playing every match.
In the laughable news category, apparently Hamburg SV stole the next greatest striker in the world, Macauley Chrisantus, out from under us and every other big club in the world. Let's see here, a youth player has a great U17 World Cup, gets hyped up and apparently everyone wants him. Well, that always works out... *cough* Anthony LeTallec *cough* *cough* Florent Sinama-Pongolle *cough*... We've learned our lesson there.
Finally, in the pot -> kettle -> black category, Real Madrid youth coach Michel took a cheap shot at us for 'stealing' 16-year-old Argentine Gerardo Bruna after the young forward had spent the three previous seasons with the Spanish club. Michel goes on to say, “How many young players taken by Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal have played for their first team? They sign the boy to a contract, make all sorts of promises and then put him in their reserves and never give him a competitive game.” Ha ha ha... is he kidding? Two words: Alvaro Arbeloa. Cheers.
The BBC just doesn't get it. In their apology for an Eastenders character making remarks about Heysel, Hillsborough, and hooliganism, they claim it was 'misinterpreted.' Any chance of such a notion should be avoided when referencing such a sensitive subject. The causes and the consequences of those events are much too complicated for a television show to handle in just a matter of a couple of lines. Stick to the lame-ass imaginary story lines and stop trying to mix in reality where real people were/are killed and other real people were/are traumatized because of it. Moving on...
There's a good chance that Daniel Agger will be back for the Newcastle match at St. James Park. The 22-year-old Dane is expected to return to full training next week. Since Hyypiä will probably play for Finland next Tuesday, the young centre back's return couldn't come at a better time. Yossi Benayoun could be back in action for the Tyneside tie as well, but Xabi Alonso will be at least an additional week if not more.
In transfer market news, Rafa is ready to sell Scott Carson to Villa if the club are prepared to meet his valuation. It is thought that Benitez wants at least £9m for him. I wonder if we waited until the summer, we could get a bit more for him, especially since Arsene Wenger is an admirer and is in need of a better goalie. Of course, if we could use that money to sign Masche on a permanent, there's no question we should sell.
Sticking to transfers, we are apparently interested in Juventus defender Jonathan Zebina. The 29-year-old Frenchman has apparently fallen out of favor with Claudio Reyna at the Old Lady and could be available in the January transfer window. He can play both right-back and central defense. I say if the price is right, why not? The more the merrier, as long as he doesn't mind not playing every match.
In the laughable news category, apparently Hamburg SV stole the next greatest striker in the world, Macauley Chrisantus, out from under us and every other big club in the world. Let's see here, a youth player has a great U17 World Cup, gets hyped up and apparently everyone wants him. Well, that always works out... *cough* Anthony LeTallec *cough* *cough* Florent Sinama-Pongolle *cough*... We've learned our lesson there.
Finally, in the pot -> kettle -> black category, Real Madrid youth coach Michel took a cheap shot at us for 'stealing' 16-year-old Argentine Gerardo Bruna after the young forward had spent the three previous seasons with the Spanish club. Michel goes on to say, “How many young players taken by Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal have played for their first team? They sign the boy to a contract, make all sorts of promises and then put him in their reserves and never give him a competitive game.” Ha ha ha... is he kidding? Two words: Alvaro Arbeloa. Cheers.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Today's Banter: Owners 'rift' rubbished, A return to England for Cissé?, Riise to stay, & Rush praises Rafa's tactics
Club Chief Executive Rick Parry has stated that the rift between Tom Hicks and George Gillett is totally fabricated. The 52-year-old revealed that he has recently spent time with both owners and drew no such conclusions of a breach in their partnership. Even if there was, I sincerely doubt the papers would know about it before something major occurred. Parry added that Gillett and Hicks are still on the same page concerning the future of the club and are working on a refinancing package to be completed in the next 30 days.
Former LFC striker Djibril Cissé may be on his way back to the Premiership. The 26-year-old French international has fallen out of favor with his current club, Marseille, and is looking to go elsewhere. It is no surprise that 'Money Bags' Shinawatra at Man City and Eggert 'Big Paper' Magnússon of West Ham are the two being linked to him. Cissé is married to an English woman and still owns a home in Cheshire.
John Arne Riise has rubbished claims that he'll be joining fellow Norwegian John Carew at Aston Villa in January. The recently turned 27-year-old seems very pragmatic about his current dip in form and is looking to improve. Riise has had glimpses of brilliance, but they've been far and few between. He was simply dazzling in the preseason, but at the very least, wholly inconsistent since. Maybe he can get some pointers from Hyypia about how to find his top self once again. I'd rather he stick around, but if he's going to continue to be a detriment, I can't see any reason to keep him aboard.
Finally, Ian Rush has praised Rafa for the tactics he employed in the Fulham match, especially bringing on Torres at just the right time. One of the things that he states in that article that I agree with is that he doesn't believe Rafa wanted to keep the same line-up as the Besitkas match. I really think Rafa did so as a message to his players that he doesn't always rotate on the basis of who's fresh or for tactical reasons. I think he wanted to let them know if they perform well, they'll get more playing chances, a notion some don't think Rafa believes in. Cheers.
Former LFC striker Djibril Cissé may be on his way back to the Premiership. The 26-year-old French international has fallen out of favor with his current club, Marseille, and is looking to go elsewhere. It is no surprise that 'Money Bags' Shinawatra at Man City and Eggert 'Big Paper' Magnússon of West Ham are the two being linked to him. Cissé is married to an English woman and still owns a home in Cheshire.
John Arne Riise has rubbished claims that he'll be joining fellow Norwegian John Carew at Aston Villa in January. The recently turned 27-year-old seems very pragmatic about his current dip in form and is looking to improve. Riise has had glimpses of brilliance, but they've been far and few between. He was simply dazzling in the preseason, but at the very least, wholly inconsistent since. Maybe he can get some pointers from Hyypia about how to find his top self once again. I'd rather he stick around, but if he's going to continue to be a detriment, I can't see any reason to keep him aboard.
Finally, Ian Rush has praised Rafa for the tactics he employed in the Fulham match, especially bringing on Torres at just the right time. One of the things that he states in that article that I agree with is that he doesn't believe Rafa wanted to keep the same line-up as the Besitkas match. I really think Rafa did so as a message to his players that he doesn't always rotate on the basis of who's fresh or for tactical reasons. I think he wanted to let them know if they perform well, they'll get more playing chances, a notion some don't think Rafa believes in. Cheers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Before I get to my ratings for Saturday's match, I'd just like to say that there's absolutely nothing going on with our beloved ...
-
Three of our on-loan kids have a good chance of seeing action today as their respective clubs are in action for the Johnstone Paint Trophy. ...
-
Whether it be zonal marking or squad rotation, all too often football pundits are guilty of lazy journalism as they attempt to simplify a co...
-
Wow, I haven't seen a bad bit of business like this in a long time. Especially not in a single day. Ander Herrera will be 25-years-old ...
-
Most efficient attacking sides in the EPL: ape Man City 0.700 Tottenham 0.698 Man U 0.690 Arsenal 0.674 Chelsea 0.669 City and Tot...
-
Swansea City will look to extend an unbeaten run of 10 matches tonight when they face Huddersfield Town at the Liberty. It is unclear wheth... -
- One of the bigger mysteries at Liverpool, outside of the enigma that is Harry Kewell, is Javier Mascherano's contract situation. The ...
-
For the past few days I've been mulling over data from the obscure to the obvious for a number of reasons. I really want to get an idea...
-
Today's Banter: Liverpool may save Luton, Rush rates Crouch, Gerrard refuses Chucky Fab game, & moreIf Luton Town can somehow manage to beat Nottingham Forest next Tuesday night and advance to the next round of the FA Cup to square off agai...
-
As I sat around with some friends this past Sunday watching some NFL and patiently awaiting the US-Brazil friendly in Chicago, I got to thin...
