npg90 | gcp90 | ccp90 | ap90 | ccv |
0.14 | 0.33 | 1.55 | 0.19 | 12.1 |
pass % | bp% | sacc% | shot% | TTI90 |
83 | 44.7 | 29.4 | 8.8 | 13.4 |
gap90 | gsp90 | gop90 | tgop | gopd |
0.8 | 1.88 | 1.08 | 1.34 | -0.26 |
So he's a good passer, but not exceptional. His 1.55 chances created per 90 and 12.1% chance created value aren't bad, but his own club averaged 1.01 ccp90 and 14.4% ccv. A 13.4 TTI90 is far from impressive and when he was on the pitch his side averaged -0.26 goals per 90 minutes.
His defensive stats aren't very impressive either. He averaged 2.49 tp90 at a 42.4% success rate, 1.4 intp90, 0.47 clrp90, and was dribbled past at least once a match. Nothing to get excited about.
So what's the big deal about him? He's a good passer, that's it. It's not like Atletico Madrid was so much better with him on the pitch. In fact, the 30 matches he played, they accumulated 66 points, which is not bad, but the 8 matches he did not play, they won, earning all possible 24 points.
This is an easy one, Rodgers, just walk on...