I hope that was the worse match I ever see Torres play. Much credit to the Man City defense is due though, particularly Dunne and Richards. I knew that Richards would be able to match El NiƱo's pace, but I was unaware Dunne would out-power him. That clearly canceled out our young Spanish strikers one-on-one abilities, which leaves him to rely on his other attributes. Obviously he needs to work on his passing, but he's not the only one. Benayoun and Babel frustratingly held on to the ball way too long as well.
In some ways it was a bizarre affair with Kuyt being the better forward on the day, Aurelio basically playing the John Arne Riise role, though an improved version as of late, and Arbeloa starting at centre back, where he appeared to be lost until about a half hour in. Most the positives were on the defensive side of the ball, with Carra and Mascherano not allowing Man City to exert themselves on attack. On the other side, the aforementioned Kuyt had one of his better days while Kewell almost looked back to the form of old.
In the first half, Gerrard arrested most of our attacking development by staying too far back. Maybe he was distrustful of Arbeloa and wanted to make sure he settled in before going too far forward, no matter what, it clearly made us a less dangerous side early on. Carra was absolutely out-of-his-mind in the first half, determined not to allow Man City a lead. Most of the time I don't really care for players taking shots 30 yards plus out, but Aurelio looked the threat, so I say fire away.
The second half was utter domination from our boys, keeping the ball in their half most of the 48 minutes. Our old demon from previous seasons of being unable to finish re-appeared somewhat, but it really was the outstanding play of the Man City defense. Playing back and boring, a staple of the Sven days with the Three Lions, looked to be their game plan, and it worked on the day. We had our chances though and didn't covert, particularly Torres, and usually taking a point away at a side as good as Man City would be a satisfactory result, but we were without a doubt the superior side.
Ultimately, we're going to have to win these matches if we hope to compete for the leauge, especially when Man U falters. Also, playing as well as we did, and overall, we played quite well, while not getting the result, cannot do much for our confidence. Thankfully we have Wigan coming to Anfield on Wednesday.
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Liverpool 0, Man City 0: He may be gold, but he's not perfect
Labels:
LFC,
Liverpool,
liverpool fc,
Man City,
Manchester City
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Whether it be zonal marking or squad rotation, all too often football pundits are guilty of lazy journalism as they attempt to simplify a co...
-
...but will we turn cartwheels across the floor? Here's the line-up: Reina Riise Hobbs Carragher Arbeloa Voronin Mascherano Sissoko Gerr...
-
Here's a video of Pascal Feindouno, the Guinea midfielder/striker, we're after.
-
...all we have to do is call on Stevie-G. Fekkin' brilliant. And he had a shit match otherwise. As I said in my preview, this was not g...
-
A special pair of boots, Our D-agger wears a special pair of boots. Gees. Let's hope he's back to best form as soon as humanly possi...
-
1. Joe Allen isn't championship material. Well, he would be great in the Championship, but Liverpool will never win anything starting h...
-
Swansea City will look to extend an unbeaten run of 10 matches tonight when they face Huddersfield Town at the Liberty. It is unclear wheth...
-
Only players with 120 minutes played are considered. - Joey Barton leads all EPL players with 10 chances created. Eden Hazard is secon...
-
Before I get to my ratings for Saturday's match, I'd just like to say that there's absolutely nothing going on with our beloved ...
-
Wow, I haven't seen a bad bit of business like this in a long time. Especially not in a single day. Ander Herrera will be 25-years-old ...