I hope that was the worse match I ever see Torres play. Much credit to the Man City defense is due though, particularly Dunne and Richards. I knew that Richards would be able to match El Niño's pace, but I was unaware Dunne would out-power him. That clearly canceled out our young Spanish strikers one-on-one abilities, which leaves him to rely on his other attributes. Obviously he needs to work on his passing, but he's not the only one. Benayoun and Babel frustratingly held on to the ball way too long as well.
In some ways it was a bizarre affair with Kuyt being the better forward on the day, Aurelio basically playing the John Arne Riise role, though an improved version as of late, and Arbeloa starting at centre back, where he appeared to be lost until about a half hour in. Most the positives were on the defensive side of the ball, with Carra and Mascherano not allowing Man City to exert themselves on attack. On the other side, the aforementioned Kuyt had one of his better days while Kewell almost looked back to the form of old.
In the first half, Gerrard arrested most of our attacking development by staying too far back. Maybe he was distrustful of Arbeloa and wanted to make sure he settled in before going too far forward, no matter what, it clearly made us a less dangerous side early on. Carra was absolutely out-of-his-mind in the first half, determined not to allow Man City a lead. Most of the time I don't really care for players taking shots 30 yards plus out, but Aurelio looked the threat, so I say fire away.
The second half was utter domination from our boys, keeping the ball in their half most of the 48 minutes. Our old demon from previous seasons of being unable to finish re-appeared somewhat, but it really was the outstanding play of the Man City defense. Playing back and boring, a staple of the Sven days with the Three Lions, looked to be their game plan, and it worked on the day. We had our chances though and didn't covert, particularly Torres, and usually taking a point away at a side as good as Man City would be a satisfactory result, but we were without a doubt the superior side.
Ultimately, we're going to have to win these matches if we hope to compete for the leauge, especially when Man U falters. Also, playing as well as we did, and overall, we played quite well, while not getting the result, cannot do much for our confidence. Thankfully we have Wigan coming to Anfield on Wednesday.
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Liverpool 0, Man City 0: He may be gold, but he's not perfect
Labels:
LFC,
Liverpool,
liverpool fc,
Man City,
Manchester City
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Brendan Rodgers is not a bad manager, but he's young and still has to learn from his mistakes. Unfortunately, Liverpool may not be the ...
-
Before all you fan boys get out your stakes out and start your trash can fires, this post isn't going to be a complete slagging of Balot...
-
It's getting old. We are not good enough to challenge for even a Champions league spot and that's becoming more apparent by the mat...
-
I would have much preferred Barça or Man U to the Blues. Sure we've beaten them twice in the league this season, but that was without t...
-
Whether we bring in another left back or not ( hopefully not Moreno though ), Jose Enrique has the right to win his place back. If he can r...
-
Apparently Nemanja Vidić is the current odds on favorite to win PFA Player of the Year this season, and well, that sort...
-
In the past 20 league meetings at City, Liverpool is 5-9-6, having failed to win at the Etihad in six years, losing 3 of the last 4. Prior ...
-
1. Dejan Lovren is the new Boss. And a much needed one. He took command of the defence and dared Borussia to attempt attack. He is wha...
-
Jordan Henderson has come a long way since his Sunderland days. When Dalglish bought him in June of 2011 for a staggering £16m, I was more...
-
Only players with 120 minutes played are considered. - Joey Barton leads all EPL players with 10 chances created. Eden Hazard is secon...
No comments:
Post a Comment