Using the same line-up against Fulham as they did against Besitkas, though unexpected from Rafa, eventually proved ineffective. In fact, our change in plan of attack might as well have been thrown out the door as the game-winning goal by Torres was set-up by a long ball. I guess it's okay to change-up in strategy from time to time, especially when one approach appears not to be working, but hopefully we'll try to go with the more patient approach first and then resort to other tactics if needs be.
The second half started promising as we tried to mount a calm and calculating attack. Mascherano took significant strides to erase the memories of his subpar first half display. We created opportunites, but failed to finish. One thing I noticed was the absence of Arbeloa who was so prominent in the first. He appeared to sit back more in the second though it didn't do much good, the flanks were used even less in the first, which I think was part of the problem of our inability to score.
Our attack and focus seemed to be concentrated in the central part of the field. Failure to use the whole field allowed Fulham to concentrate their defensive efforts as well, putting more bodies over the middle and basically 'getting in the way'. At one point a cross by Aurelio alluded the whole side and rolled to the right where not a single player was lurking past the far side post. Benayoun appeared to have free roam of the field, which ended up just making him null and void. In the Besitkas match, his constant pushing and domination of the right side of the field were crucial in creating opportunities for others.
Overall we won because of the amazing talent of our world class striker, Fernando Torres. The kid is simply amazing and his goal was exactly what we needed and exactly what Niemi, who was having an amazing match, did not expect. That's what you get for £26m and it was well worth it. It's a convenience that we can't afford to take for granted.
In some ways this match was a step back. We started off trying to get a quick, cheap goal via the long ball and though that pretty much eliminates our opponent's chances to score through counter, it's essentially the recipe for a nil-nil draw. We also failed to use the flanks, abandoning the notion almost entirely in the second half. Finally, our off-the-ball movement was inexistent or just lacked inspiration and intelligence. In the end, one could argue we were 'just lucky' and if it weren't for a Crouch dive, 'very lucky'.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Liverpool 2, Fulham 0: Torres saves the day
Labels:
Fernando Torres,
Fulham,
LFC,
Liverpool,
liverpool fc
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Before I get to my grades, let me say a couple of things. First off, until you accept that we just aren't good enough to win the League...
-
Here's a video of the 20-year-old French striker/attacking midfielder who plays for Monaco that we're supposedly looking to sign in ...
-
Liverpool videos A compilation of skill displayed before his injury last year (mind the music): His dead-on cross-assist to Crouch versus Ga...
-
Ugh, I had nightmares about this game for about two weeks until I finally won the league. My hand-eye coordination is not what it was 20 y...
-
I'm obsessed... with numbers that is. Yesterday I wrote a piece about how Man U severrely skewed the market for overpaying for Herrera...
-
Well, first let's get to the ridiculous rumor of the day. Apparently Jose Mourinho is interested in taking over at Liverpool if Rafa we...
-
As I mentioned in my last post, I've been tediously mulling over data during the international break, the extent of which might deem me ...
-
Tell me when I can stop holding my breathe. There are very few things that upset me when it comes to my beloved Liverpool. Losing to Manche...
-
To win: Man City 13/15 60.21% Liverpool 10/3 20.64% Draw 3/1 19.15% Not enough money on City and too much of a pay...
-
There isn't really much going on in the world of Liverpool Football Club, just reiterations of yesterday's headlines, so I've de...
No comments:
Post a Comment