Dejan Lovren, on the other hand, could. The 25-year-old Southampton and Serbian international anchored a very solid Saints defense last season. In fact, in my overall defense ranking table, the South Coast side finished third, only a point from being tied top with Chelsea and Crystal Palace. As I have said, I don't think individual defensive stats hold much water, but I do think in the very least, you can find fault and strength. Here are Lovren's stats from last season along with those of Sakho, Skrtel, Agger, and Old Man Toure.
Lovren | Sakho | Skrtel | Agger | Toure | |
age | 25 | 24 | 29 | 29 | 34 |
app(subs) | 31 | 18(1) | 36 | 16(4) | 15(5) |
mins | 2787 | 1478 | 3221 | 1421 | 1443 |
goals | 2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 |
assist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
chances | 4 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
npgp90 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 0.13 | 0 |
gcp90 | 0.1 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.13 |
ccp90 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.2 | 0.13 | 0.44 |
ap90 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
ccv | 0.23 | 0 | 0.15 | 0.46 | 0.3 |
pass% | 82 | 92.5 | 90.8 | 89.1 | 86.4 |
bp% | 21.5 | 22.6 | 23.7 | 18.7 | 20.5 |
sacc% | 15.2 | 10 | 53.3 | 42.8 | 14.3 |
shot% | 9 | 10 | 46.7 | 28.6 | 0 |
tp90 | 2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 2.1 |
tack % | 57.8 | 71.4 | 50 | 55.6 | 65.1 |
intp90 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
clrp90 | 7.7 | 8.3 | 11.5 | 7.2 | 9.2 |
dribpp90 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
bsp90 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
adwp90 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 2.7 |
adwon% | 61.2 | 56 | 70.1 | 65.2 | 50.6 |
TTI90 | 10.4 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5 | 5.8 |
So what does Lovren do well? Interceptions and aerial duels certainly stand out. Though it's kind of disconcerting that he's easily taken off the dribble more than the other four, especially Toure. It questions his pace and quickness. He also turns over the ball significantly more and he had less touches than Skrtel, so the 'Suarez' factor does not come into play.
Is he worth the reported £20m that it may cost to bring him in? Absolutely not. If he alone was the reason the Saints defense was so good, yes, but they have/had Schneiderlin, Wanyama, Fonte, Clyne, and Shaw. None of those five, save Shaw, is worth that much, and that's only because Shaw is 19. I'd rather us just try and sigh Steven Caulker.
No comments:
Post a Comment